摘要
目的：探讨奥沙拉嗪治疗溃疡性结肠炎（UC）的临床效果.方法：选择80例UC患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组各40例,治疗组用奥沙拉嗪治疗,对照组用柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗,比较两组疗效和不良反应.结果：治疗组总有效率为77.5%,对照组为67.5%,两组疗效相近,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;治疗组不良反应发生率为10%,对照组不良反应发生率为22.5%,差异显著（P〈0.05）.结论：奥沙拉嗪治疗溃疡性结肠炎与柳氮磺胺吡啶相近,但不良反应少,更适宜在临床应用.
Objective： Discusses Austria salad qin treatment ulcerous colitis （UC） the clinical effect. Methods：Chooses 80 example UC patient, divides into the treatment group and control group each 40 examples stochastically,the treatment group with the Austria salad qin treatment,the control group with the willow tree nitrogen sulfidin sulfanilylpyridine treatment,and responded not good compared with two groups of curative effects. Results：Treatment group total effectiveness is 77.5%, the control group is 67.5%, two groups of curative effects is close,difference non--statistics significance （P〉0. 05） ;The treatment group responded not good the formation rate is 10 %,the control group responded not good the formation rate is 22.5%, difference remarkable （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The Austria salad qin treatment ulcerous colitis and the willow tree nitrogen sutfidin sulfanilylpyridine is close, but responds not good few,is suitable in the clinical practice.
出处
《按摩与康复医学》
2011年第2期240-241,共2页
Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
奥沙拉嗪
溃疡性结肠炎
柳氮磺胺吡啶
Austria salad qin Ulcerous colitis Willow tree nitrogen sulfidin sulfanilylpyridine
