期刊文献+

卡铂联合紫杉醇方案中不同药物剂量对骨髓抑制的影响 被引量:16

Analysis of relative factors of bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy with carboplatin andpaclitaxel on the patients with ovarian cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨卡铂联合紫杉醇(Tc)方案中不同药物剂量对卵巢癌患者骨髓抑制的影响。方法回顾性分析2002年1月至2007年12月间在北京妇产医院妇瘤科采用Tc方案化疗的卵巢癌患者62例(共196个疗程)的骨髓抑制情况。卡铂剂量的确定:以血浆浓度一时间曲线下面积(AUC)4~6为卡铂低剂量(147个疗程),AUC〉6—7为卡铂高剂量(49个疗程);紫杉醇剂量的确定:以135-〈150mg/m^2为紫杉醇低剂量(37个疗程),150~175mg/m^2为紫杉醇高剂量(159个疗程)。根据每个疗程后血常规检查结果确定骨髓抑制程度,采用x^2检验(单因素分析)及logistic回归法(多因素分析)分析影响骨髓抑制的相关因素,包括年龄、身高、体质量、体表面积、病理分化程度、病理类型、手术病理分期、血清肌酐浓度、内生肌酐清除率、出现骨髓抑制的疗程序列数(疗程数)、卡铂剂量、紫杉醇剂量;并采用X^2检验分析Tc方案中不同卡铂和紫杉醇剂量对骨髓抑制的影响。结果(1)骨髓抑制情况:轻度骨髓抑制(0~11度)共159个疗程,占81.1%;重度骨髓抑制(Ⅲ~Ⅳ度)共37个疗程,占18.9%。(2)影响骨髓抑制的相关因素:单因素分析显示,疗程数、年龄、手术病理分期、血清肌酐浓度、内生肌酐清除率、卡铂剂量是影响骨髓抑制程度的因素(P值分别为0.000、0.000、0.018、0.033、0.001、0.000);而身高、体质量、体表面积、病理分化程度、病理类型和紫杉醇剂量与骨髓抑制程度无关(P均〉0.05)。多因素分析显示,疗程数、年龄、卡铂剂量是影响骨髓抑制程度的独立危险因素(P值分别为0.030、0.043、0.009)。(3)紫杉醇低剂量的疗程中,卡铂高剂量者重度骨髓抑制的发生率(4/14)高于卡铂低剂量者(0),差异有统计学意义(P=0.015);紫杉醇高剂量� Objective To analyze the relative factors of bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy with different-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel (TC) on the patients with ovarian cancer. Methods Sixty-two patients with ovarian cancer admitted in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from January 2002 to December 2007, using TC regimen ,a total of 196 cycles of chemotherapy,were divided into two groups by the doses of earboplatin [ area under concentration-time curve (AUC) 4 -6 for low-dose, AUC 〉 6 -7 for hight-dose, the carboplatin dose calculated with AUC ] or by the doses of paelitaxel ( 135 - 〈 150 mg/m2 low-dose,150- 175 mg/m2 hight-dose). After each TC cycle, the routine blood was test to determine the graduation of the marrow suppression, and then the correlation factors were analyzed with logistic regression. Results ( 1 ) The occurrence rate of bone marrow suppression: there were 159 cycles (81.1%) grade 0 - II bone marrow suppression, while 37 cycles (18.9%) of gradeⅢ - IV. (2) Factors related to bone marrow suppression:the results shown that there were not related to bone marrow suppression,which incluced cellular differentiation, tumor type, height, weight and paclitaxel dose (P 〉 0. 05). While, the different cycle, age, the later stages of tumor, serum creatinine concentration, endogenous creatinine clearance rate, AUC values were the relative factors of bone marrow suppression(P =0. 000,0. 000,0. 018, 0. 033, 0. 001,0. 000). Seven variables were conducted into the logistic regression and the results shown that the different cycles, the age, AUC grades were independent risk factors ( P = 0. 030,0. 043,0. 009 ). (3) When low-dose of paclitaxel was given, the occurrence of bone marrow suppression was related to the carboplatin dose AUC. The higher AUC values for carbopaltin were chosen, the higher of severe bone marrow suppression would happen. (4/14 vs 0, P = 0. 015 ). When the dose of high grade of paclitaxel was given, the occurrence of bone ma
作者 丁丁 孔为民
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期188-192,共5页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 卡铂 紫杉酚 骨髓 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 曲线下面积 Carboplatin Paclitaxel Bone marrow Antineoplastic combined chemotherapyprotocols Area under curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Alvarez RD, Armstrong DK, Chen LM, et al. Ovarian Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[ EB/OL]. (2008- 03-30) [ 2011-03-03 ]. http://www, nccn. org/professionals/ physician_gls/pdf/ovarian, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 2连利娟主编..林巧稚妇科肿瘤学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:986.
  • 3曹泽毅编著..妇科常见肿瘤诊治指南 2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:115.
  • 4孙建衡编..中国肿瘤医师临床实践指南 妇科恶性肿瘤诊疗纲要[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2009:152.
  • 5Okamoto H, Nagatomo A, Kunitoh H, et al. Prediction of carboplatin clearance calculated by patient characteristics or 24- hour creatinine clearance : a comparison of the performance of three formulae. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,1998 ,42 :307-312. 被引量:1
  • 6Calvert AH, Newel1 DR, Gumbre11 LA, et al. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol, 1989,7 : 1748-1756. 被引量:1
  • 7McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage Ill and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334:1-6. 被引量:1
  • 8赵晓东,张毅.卵巢上皮癌术后一线化疗[J].国外医学(肿瘤学分册),2004,31(4):295-299. 被引量:14
  • 9谷力加,吴一龙,冯卫能,翁毅敏,程超,钟文昭,黄绍洪.按AUC与体表面积计算伯尔定用量化疗毒性和疗效比较[J].中山医科大学学报,2002,23(B09):93-94. 被引量:3
  • 10Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Thiriaux J, et al. A comparison of methods of calculation for estimating earboplatin AUC with a retrospective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party. Eur J Cancer. 1999.35 : 1314-1319. 被引量:1

二级参考文献42

  • 1Advanced Ovarian Trialists' Group. Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists'Group. Br J Cancer, 1998,78(11) :1479-1487. 被引量:1
  • 2McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med, 1996,334(1): 1-6. 被引量:1
  • 3Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, et al. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000,92(9) :699-708. 被引量:1
  • 4Muggia FM,Braly PS,Brady MF, et al. Phase Ⅲ randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage Ⅲ or Ⅳ ovarian cancer:a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol, 2000,18 ( 1 ): 106-115. 被引量:1
  • 5Colombo N,on behalf of the ICON collaborators. Randomized trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus a control arm of carboplatin or CAP: the third international collaborative ovarian neoplasm study.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2000,19:379a. 被引量:1
  • 6International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet,2002,360(9332) :505-515. 被引量:1
  • 7The ICON Collaborators. ICON2: randomised trial of single-agent carboplatin against three-drug combination of CAP (cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin,and cisplatin) in women with ovarian cancer.ICON Collaborators. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Study. Lancet, 1998,352(9140) :1571-1576. 被引量:1
  • 8Luck HJ, Du Bois A, Weber B, et al. The integration of anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2001,11 (Suppl 1) :34-38. 被引量:1
  • 9Romanini A, Tanganelli L, Camino F, et al. First-line chemotherapy with epidoxoruicin, paclitaxel,and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,89(3) :354-359. 被引量:1
  • 10Neijt JP, Engelholm SA, Tuxen MK, et al. Exploratory phase Ⅲ study of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2000,18 ( 17 ): 3084-3092. 被引量:1

共引文献53

同被引文献127

引证文献16

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部