摘要
目的:观察平补平泻针刺法与电针疗法治疗周围性面瘫早期的临床疗效。方法:60例患者随机分为治疗组(平补平泻针刺组)和对照组(电针组),每组各30例,两组均取常用穴位:翳风、合谷、颊车、攒竹、迎香、人中、阳白、四白、外关、足三里等。每天针刺1次,10天为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程,第1个疗程结束后休息3天。结果:治疗1个疗程后两组显效率及有效率均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中显效率治疗组60.00%,对照组43.33%;有效率治疗组86.67%,对照组56.67%。治疗2个疗程后两组显效率及有效率均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中显效率治疗组90.00%,对照组56.67%;有效率治疗组96.70%,对照组73.33%。结论:对周围性面瘫患者早期取常用穴,平补平泻针刺法的临床效果优于电针疗法。
Objective：To observe the clinical effect of different acupuncture treatment on peripheral facial paralysis patients.Methods： A randomized controlled trial was designed.Sixty peripheral facial paralysis patients were randomly and averagely divided into treatment group and control group.Acupoints were chosen according to the international standard acupoints chosen method.Chosen acupoints are as follows： Yifeng,Hegu,Jiache,Zanzhu,Yingxiang,Renzhong,Yangbai,Sibai,Waiguan,Zusanli and among many others.Mildacupuncture method was taken in treatment group,whereas electricity acupuncture method was adopted in control group.Patients all accepted acupuncture treatment every day in two treatment courses,each course lasted 10 day,the two courses had a three day interval.Results： After the first treatment course,total obvious effect and total response all had statistical significance（P0.05）,total obvious effect and total response were separatly 60.00% and 86.67% in treatment group,43.33% and 56.67% in control group.After second treatment course,total obvious effect and total response all had statistical significance（P0.05）,total obvious effect and total response were separately 90.00% and 96.70% in treatment group,56.67% and 73.33% in control group.Conclusion： Mildacupuncture method is better than electricity acupuncture method on early period of peripheral facial paralysis patient.
出处
《四川中医》
2011年第4期109-110,共2页
Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
针刺疗法
平补平泻针刺法
电针
周围性面瘫
peripheral facial paralysis conventional acupuncture point mildacupuncture method electricity-acupuncture method
