摘要
刑事诉讼中如何处理私人非法取得的证据是一个理论和实践都不能回避的重要课题。美国的"私人放任模式"和德国的"利益权衡模式"分别是处理私人违法所得证据的证据能力的两种典型模式,这两种模式各有其不同的特征和利弊得失。私人违法取证在我国刑事诉讼司法实践中普遍存在,但立法规定和理论研究薄弱,私人违法证据的两种典型模式对我国证据立法和理论的发展和完善有一定的启示。
In terms of the criminal procedure, to deal with the evidence illegally obtained by individuals is inevitably an issue of vital importance both in theory and in practice. There are two representative modes of evidence competence dealing with the illegal evidence acquired individuals. One isthe American ＂Individual Noninterference＂ ,and the other is the German ＂Interests Balancing＂. Both have their own characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages. Collecting evidence illegally by individual commonly exists in the criminal procedure practice of China, while the legislative regulation and theoretical study are still relatively weak. These two typical modes are, to some extent, enlightening to develop and perfect Chinese evidence theory and legislation.
出处
《证据科学》
2011年第1期56-63,共8页
Evidence Science
关键词
私人违法所得证据
证据能力
非法证据排除规则
证据禁止
Evidence illegally obtained by individuals, Evidence competence, Rule of excluding illegal evidence, Eyidenee prohibition
