期刊文献+

两种经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗不稳定胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较 被引量:16

Application of two different percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation techniques in treatment of unstable thoracic and lumbar vertebrae fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨2种经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗不稳定胸腰椎骨折的可行性及疗效比较。方法 2007年6月-2009年5月,采用2种经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗单节段无神经症状的不稳定胸腰椎骨折患者28例,其中12例使用丹历枢法模公司生产的Sextent经皮椎弓根螺钉系统,16例采用本院自行总结的"触摸法"经皮椎弓根螺钉技术(使用国产USS椎弓根螺钉系统)。分别比较2组间术前、术后伤椎前缘高度百分比、后凸Cobb角、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及带支具下床时间。结果所有患者均获得9-18个月(平均14个月)的随访,所有患者的术后伤椎前缘高度百分比、后凸Cobb角较术前均有显著的恢复,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);但2组住院时间及带支具下床时间差异无统计学(P〉0.05);"触摸法"手术组的手术时间明显缩短,术中出血量明显减少,与Sextent系统手术组相比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论 2种经皮椎弓根螺钉技术均是治疗不稳定胸腰椎骨折的有效方法,但"触摸法"具有手术操作更简单、费用较低等优点。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and curative effect of 2 different percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation techniques in the treatment of unstable thoracic and lumbar vertebrae fractures.Methods From June 2007 to May 2009,28 patients with single segment fractures of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were treated with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation.All the patients had no neurological deficits.Twelve patients were treated with Sextent transpedicular screw internal fixation system manufactured by Dandou Sofamor Company,and the other 16 patients were treated with general transpedicular screw internal fixation system called "touch technique".The anterior height of injury vertebrae,Cobb's angle,operation time,blood loss,length of stay and out-bed activity were compared.Results All the patients were followed up for an average time of 14 months(range 9-18 months).After operation,all the patients obtained a significant improvement of anterior height of injury vertebrae and Cobb's angle.The differences were statistical significance(P0.01).There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in length of stay and out-bed activity(P0.05).The operation time and blood loss were significant decreased when treated with "touch technique",and the differences were statistical significance(P0.01).Conclusion The 2 different percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation techniques were all effective,but "touch technique" has the advantages of simple manipulation and low cost.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2010年第6期352-355,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 脊柱骨折 内固定器 外科手术 微创性 Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Spinal fractures Internal fixators Surgical procedures minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bono CM , Vaccaro AR. Minimally invasive spine surgery[ M]. New York : Marcel-Dekker, 2006:5-9. 被引量:1
  • 2Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(15 Suppl) :S26 -35. 被引量:1
  • 3张朝跃,刘波,刘振东.脊柱显微内镜在治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床应用(附129例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(7):700-702. 被引量:12
  • 4German JW, Foley KT. Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30( 16 Suppl) :S52 -59. 被引量:1
  • 5Denis F. Spinal instability as defined by the three column spineconcept in acute spinal trauma [ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984, (189) : 65 -76. 被引量:1
  • 6Ringel F, Stoffel M, Sttier C, et al. Minimally invasive transmus- cular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine[ J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 59 (4 Suppl 2) : 0NS361 - 366. 被引量:1
  • 7Alexander R, Vaccaro MD, Eli M. Baron operative techniques: Spine surgery[ M]. London : Elsevier, 2009:293 - 300. 被引量:1
  • 8Teitelbaum GP, Shaolian S, McDougall CG, et al. New percuta- neously inserted spinal fixation system [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(6) :703 -709. 被引量:1
  • 9黄其杉,彭茂秀,林焱,毛方敏,倪文飞,王向阳,池永龙,徐华梓.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(12):758-760. 被引量:49
  • 10International Society for the Study of the Lumber Spine Staff. The Lumber Spine [ M ]. Lippincott Williams : Elsevier Science, 2006:778 - 823. 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

  • 1SPIVAK JM. Degenerative lumber spinal stenosis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1998, 80(7): 1053-1066. 被引量:1
  • 2SCHICK U, DOHNERT J. Technique of microendoscopy in medial lumbar disc herniation[J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002,45(3): 139-141. 被引量:1
  • 3NAKAGAWA H, KAMIMURA M, UCHIYAMA S, et al. Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapse[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2003, 10(2): 231-235. 被引量:1
  • 4Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85: 773-781. 被引量:1
  • 5Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine, 2001, 26: 1038-1045. 被引量:1
  • 6Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, et al. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984,(189): 142-149. 被引量:1
  • 7Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2000,82: 1458-1476. 被引量:1
  • 8Carl AL, Tromanhauser SG, Roger DJ. Pedicle screw instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures and fracture-dislocations. Spine,1992, 17(8 Suppl): S317-S324. 被引量:1
  • 9张朝跃,彭耀庆,吴松,江皓,臧晓芳,杨檑,苗杰,詹新立.脊柱显微内窥镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的手术适应证与术式选择探讨[J].中国医师杂志,2002,4(1):14-16. 被引量:12
  • 10张朝跃,柏绍平.脊柱显微内窥镜术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].湖南医科大学学报,2001,26(5):457-459. 被引量:17

共引文献56

同被引文献114

引证文献16

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部