期刊文献+

《育儿评估量表》研究

A study on parenting assessment tool in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究《育儿评估量表》,用于评价中国3~6岁儿童父母养育状况。方法采用标准化量表编制程序,包含多种定性研究方法:①通过对专业人员(n=25)及3~6岁儿童父母(n=25)进行专题小组讨论,专家咨询(n=7),文献查阅等方法建立条目库;②由儿童保健及测量学领域内专家(n=15)对问卷进行审阅,进行条目库修改;③综合专家评分法(n=15)及因素分析法进行条目筛选。结果初始条目库包含H7个条目,经条目筛选后保留50个条目用以构成《育儿评估量表》。结论《育儿评估量表》是国内首个以3~6岁儿童父母为研究对象的养育状况评估工具。该研究形成了量表的初始版本,将进一步进行大规模调查以对量表的信度、效度进行检验。 Objective To develop a parenting assessment tool (PAT) in China to assess parenting conditions of Chinese parents for their children aged 3-6 years. Methods The standardized scale developing procedure was adopted, including: (1)Item pool was established through focus group discussion between professionals ( n = 25 ) and parents ( n = 25 ), consultation with experts ( n = 7 ) and literature review; (2)Item pool was modified through child health experts and anthropometrists' check and approval; (3)Items of the scale were screened and selected by expert scoring (n = 15 ) and factor analysis. Results The item pool consisted of 117 items. After screening and selection ,50 items were remained to construct a preliminary version of PAT scale. Conclusion The PAT developed by this study is the first measurement for assessing parenting conditions of parents for their children aged 3-6 years in mainland of China and it is only a preliminary version. So, large scale investigation needs to be conducted to test reliability and validity of PAT.
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2011年第2期123-124,241,共3页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 养育 评估 量表 定性研究 parenting assessment scale qualitative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Johnson J R, Temple R. Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs [J]. Cancer Treat Rep, 1985,69 (10): 1155-1157. 被引量:1
  • 2Aaronson N K, Meyerowits B E, Bard M, et al. Quality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities[J]. Cancer, 1991,67(Suppl 3):839-843. 被引量:1
  • 3Fayers P, Bottomley A. Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30 [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2002,38(Suppl 4):S125-S133. 被引量:1
  • 4Cella D F, Tulsky D S, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1993,11 (3):570-579. 被引量:1
  • 5The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): devolvement and general psychometric properties [J]. Soc Sci Med, 1998,46 (12):1569-1585. 被引量:1
  • 6Ferrell B R, Dow K H, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors [J]. Qual Life Res, 1995,4(6):523-531. 被引量:1
  • 7Bonomi A E, Patrick D L, Bushnell D M, et al. Quality of life measurement:will we ever be satisfied? [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2000,53(1): 19-23. 被引量:1
  • 8Aaronson N K, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993,85(5):365-376. 被引量:1
  • 9Brueker P S, Yost K, Cashy J, et al. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) [J]. Eval Health Prof, 2005,28(2): 192-211. 被引量:1
  • 10万崇华,罗家洪,张灿珍,汤学良,陈明清,宋元龙,张晓磬,蔡乐,许传志,李晓梅,周梅,黄莹,卢玉波,张冬梅.癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2003,12(3):341-342. 被引量:72

共引文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部