期刊文献+

480例剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药使用调查 被引量:1

Investigation of the Application of Antibiotics Used in 480 Perioperative Patients with Caesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查我院剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药使用情况,为抗菌药的合理应用提供参考。方法:采用回顾性方法,对我院2009年6月~2010年5月480名剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药使用情况进行调查。结果:480例患者100%使用抗菌药,抗菌药联合使用率为7.08%,预防用药均于术前30min给药;大部分抗菌药的药物利用指数≤1;术后感染率为0.83%;107例胎膜早破孕产妇宫颈分泌物病原菌阳性率42.06%。结论:我院剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药的使用还存在一些不合理现象,应进一步加强围手术期抗菌药管理,促进其合理使用。 Objective: To analyze the application of antibiotics used in the perioperative patients with Caesarean in our hospital in order to evaluate the rational use of antibiotics. Method:A total of 480 cases were retrospectively investigated from Jun 2009 to May 2010, and the usage of antibiotics was analyzed. Result:All of the 480 caesarean-operation patients used antibiotics. The rate of antibiotics combination was 7.08%. All the patients were given preventive drugs at 0.5 h before operation. Most of the drug use indexes (DUI) were ≤ 1. The surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 0.83%. The positive rate was 42.06% (452107) of the 107 patients with bacterial premature rupture of membrane. Conclusion: There was an irrational prophylactic use of antibacterials for caesarean section patients during the perioperative period in this hospital. The administration of perioperative antibacterial should be strictly managed to strengthen the reasonable use of antibacterial.
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2011年第4期195-198,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 剖宫产术 围手术期 抗菌药 药物使用分析 WORDS Caesarean section Perioperative period Antibacterials Drug utilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献64

共引文献92

同被引文献35

  • 1方英立,谢青,周文.剖宫产患者围手术期抗菌药物应用分析[J].中国医院药学杂志,2006,26(1):59-60. 被引量:16
  • 2Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B. E.,Sutton, P. D.et al.,Births: final data for 2005 [J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2007,56(6):1-103. 被引量:1
  • 3MacDorman, M.F., Menacker, F., and Declercq, E.,Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2008,35(2):293-307,. 被引量:1
  • 4Gomes, U.A., Silva, A. A., Bettiol, H.et al. ,Risk factors for the increasing cae- sarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978- 1979 and 199d[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 1999,28(4):687-94. 被引量:1
  • 5Leung, G.M., Lain, T. H., Thach, T. Q.et al., Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999[J]. Birth, 2001,28(3):166-72. 被引量:1
  • 6Mishra, U.S. and M. Ramanathan, Delivery-related complications and determi-nants of caesarean section rates in India[J]. Health Policy Plan, 2002, 17(1):90-8. 被引量:1
  • 7AbouZahr, C.K, Lessons on safe motherhood[J]. World Health Forum, 1998,19(3): 253-60. 被引量:1
  • 8Tita, A. T., Rouse, D. J., Blackwen, S.et al., Evolving Concepts in Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,113 (3):675-682. 被引量:1
  • 9Smaill, F. and G.J. Hofmeyr, Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section[J]. Cochrane Database Svst Rev, 2002(3):CD000933. 被引量:1
  • 10Hopkins L, S. and Smaill, F., Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section[J]. The Cochrane Library, 2000,4:1-52. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部