期刊文献+

基于Bootstrap-DEA的工业能源效率分析 被引量:12

THE ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY BASED ON BOOTSTRAP-DEA
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统DEA方法存在小样本估计有偏、无法进行统计检验等缺点.而Bootstrap-DEA方法能够通过数值模拟技术产生大量的模拟样本,通过对新生成的样本进行估计来修正DEA效率估计偏差,进而计算出效率值的置信区间.作者利用Bootstrap-DEA方法首次对我国36个工业行业1995-2008年的能源利用效率进行分析.研究结果表明,我国工业行业的能源效率呈现出"U"字型变动趋势,行业间的能源效率差异不断减小. The traditional DEA mothod has some shortcomings such as small sample's estimation exists biase and statistics test can't be conducted,while Bootstrap-DEA method can create many simulated samples by numerical simulation and fix the bias of energy efficiency estimated by DEA method,and then calculate the energy efficiency's confidence interval.In this paper,we first employ the Bootstrap-DEA method and analyze the energy efficiency of China's 36 industries from 1995 to 2008.The research results show that the industries energy efficiency changes with "U" shape,and the gap among the industries efficiency decreases continuously.
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期361-371,共11页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 中国科学院重大方向性项目"全球经济监测预警及政策模拟仿真平台预研项目"(编号KACX1-YW-0906).
关键词 Bootstrap-DEA模型 工业行业 能源效率 置信区间 Bootstrap-DEA model Chinese industries energy efficiency confidence interval
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. J. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444. 被引量:1
  • 2Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical approach to frontier analysis. J. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46(1-2): 7-38. 被引量:1
  • 3Banker R D, Charnes A, CooperW W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. J. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092. 被引量:1
  • 4Simar L. Estimating Efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping. J. Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1-2): 167-185. 被引量:1
  • 5Efron B. Bootstrapping methods: Another look at the jackknife. J. Ann. Statistics, 1979, (7): 243-267. 被引量:1
  • 6Simar L, Wilson P W. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. J. Management Science, 1998, 44(1): 49-61. 被引量:1
  • 7Simar L, Wilson P W. Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. J. Productivity Analysis, 2000, 13(1): 49-78. 被引量:1
  • 8Ausina E T, Tatje E G, Armero C, Conesa D. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency and malmquist productivity indices: An application to Spanish savings banks. J. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184(3): 1062-1084. 被引量:1
  • 9Hawdon D. Efficiency, performance and regulation of the international gas industry-a bootstrap DEA approach. J. Energy Policy, 2003, 31(11): 1167-1178. 被引量:1
  • 10Sanhueza R, Rudnick H, Lagunas H. DEA efficiency for the determination of the electric power distribution added value. J. Power Systems, 2004, 19(2): 919-925. 被引量:1

同被引文献186

引证文献12

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部