期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹结肠憩室切除术的疗效对比 被引量:5

Comparison of therapeutic effect between laparoscopic and open resection of colonic diverticulum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹结肠憩室切除术的临床疗效。方法:将43例结肠憩室患者随机分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,对比两组手术时间、术后4d疼痛评分、肛门排气排便时间、术后并发症发生率及术后住院时间。结果:两组手术时间、术后疼痛及术后并发症发生率等方面差异无统计学意义,术后排气排便时间及住院时间差异有统计学意义。结论:腹腔镜结肠憩室切除术安全、有效,患者痛苦小,并发症少,手术时间短,值得推广应用。 Objective:The purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic and open resection of colonic diverticulum. Methods:Forty-three patients with colonic diverticulum were divided into laparoscopic group and open group randomly.The operative time,postoperative pain score,time of anus exhaust and defecation,postoperative complication rate and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results:There was no significant difference in operative time,postoperative pain and complication rate between the two groups,but the differences of postoperative anus exhaust and defecation and hospital stay were significant. Conclusions:Laparoscopic resection of colonic diverticulum is safe and effective with advantages of less pain,complications and shorter operative time.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2011年第3期200-201,共2页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 憩室 结肠 腹腔镜检查 剖腹术 治疗结果 Diverticulum colon Laparoscopy Laparotomy Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1Attwood SE,McGrath J,Hill AD,et al.Laparoscopic approach to Meckel's diverticulectomy[J].Br J Surg,1992,79(3):211. 被引量:1
  • 2Chan KW,Lee KH,Mou JW,et al.Laparoscopic management of complicated Meckel's diverticulum in children:a 10-year review[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(6):1509-1512. 被引量:1
  • 3Ruh J,Paul A,Dirsch O,et al.Laparoscopic resection of perforated Meckel's diverticulum in a patient with clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis[J].Surg Endosc,2002,16(11):1638-1639. 被引量:1
  • 4Shalaby RY,Soliman SM,Fawy M,et al.Laparoscopic management of Meckel's diverticulum in children[J].Pediatr Surg,2005,40(3):562-567. 被引量:1
  • 5Valla JS,Steyaert H,Leculé R,et al.Meckel's diverti-culum and aparoscopy of children[J].Eur J Pediatr Surg,1998,8(1):26-28. 被引量:1
  • 6Lezoche E, Feliciotti F,Paganini AM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16: 596-602. 被引量:1
  • 7Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R,et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg-Laparosc-EndoscPercutan-Tech, 2002, 12: 88-95. 被引量:1
  • 8Kockerling F, Sebeidbach H, Schnciider G, et al. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection : early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000, 43:1503-1511. 被引量:1
  • 9Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet. 1994, 344: 8914. 被引量:1
  • 10Fleshman JW, Nelson H, Peters WR, et al. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by clinical out comes of surgical therapy(cost) study group. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996, 39: 53-58. 被引量:1

共引文献229

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部