摘要
20世纪80年代,伴随着新自由主义思潮的兴起,发达资本主义国家的不同市场经济模式集体转向了新自由主义市场经济模式。20世纪90年代,美国模式、日本模式和瑞典模式几乎同时爆发了金融危机。美国模式对新自由主义政策进行了短暂调整后,又重蹈覆辙;日本模式则在新自由主义模式与日本模式之间摇摆不定,其结果导致日本经历了"失去的二十年"。瑞典模式则在坚持自身模式合理内核的基础上,弱化了新自由主义政策主张,迅速走出危机,走向持续发展。2007年美国次贷危机标志着新自由主义模式的终结,可以预见,无论是美国模式、日本模式还是瑞典模式,都将在坚持自身模式合理内核的基础上,更加注重向经济绩效和社会绩效均衡发展的方向调整。从本质上看,无论哪种资本主义市场经济模式,都无非是资本主义生产关系的一种调节形式而已,它们都无法从根本上克服资本主义基本矛盾带来的经济周期律。
Since the 1980s, with the rise of neo- liberalism, various market economic models in the advanced capitalist countries have transformed into the neo -liberalism market economic model. In the 1990s, the U. S. model, Japanese model and Swedish model experienced financial crisis at the same time. The U. S. model repeated its mistake after a short - term adjustment on its neo - liberalism policy. Japanese model swung between the neo - liberalism model and Japanese model, which makes Japan experience＂the lost two decades＂. Swedish model persisted on its rational core, weakened the policies and proposals of neo - liberalism, and quickly shook off the crisis towards sustainable development. In 2007, the U.S. subprime crisis marked the end of neo -liberalism model. It can be expected that whatever the U.S. model, Japanese model or Swedish model would pay more attention to the balanced development of economic performance and social performance while persisting on their core. In nature, whichever capitalist market economic model is an adjustment to the capitalist production relationship. They can not overcome the basic law of economic cycles brought about by the fundamental contradiction of capitalism.
出处
《经济学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期86-95,共10页
Economist
基金
"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目--重点学科骨干人才资助项目"<马克思主义经济学与当代资本主义多样性研究>成果
项目编号:NKZXA10001
关键词
新自由主义
金融危机
日本模式
瑞典模式
美国模式
Neo -liberalism
Financial crisis
Japanese model
Swedish model
the U.S. model
