期刊文献+

正本清源:民刑交叉案件处理机制理念的重塑——从一则案例说起 被引量:4

Identifying the Source by Clarification: Reshaping Concepts of the Mechanism of Handling Civil and Criminal Overlapping Cases——Beginning with a Typical Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于民刑交叉案件的处理原则,学界似乎大多倾向"民进刑退"原则,认为"这不仅是刑法谦抑性原则的体现,更是维护当事人合法权益的保障。"实际上,从法律规范角度来讲,对于民刑交叉案件的处理应当区分刑事立法和刑事司法两个层面。刑法作为社会防卫的最后一道门槛,这是立法层面的体现;一旦行为在立法层面有所规制,以立法为裁判依据的司法就必须恪守"刑进民退"原则。 When it comes to the principle of handling civil and criminal overlapping cases,most scholars seem to prefer the principle of "superiority of civil cases to criminal cases",thinking that "this not only manifests the restricting principle of criminal law,but safeguards the legitimate rights of the parties".In fact,from the legal perspective,in dealing with civil and criminal overlapping cases,it is necessary to distinguish the criminal legislature from criminal justice.The criminal law serves as the final social defensive line,which shows the intention of legislation.Once the behaviors are restricted by legislature,justice,which is based on legislative rulings,should stick to the principle of "superiority of civil cases to criminal cases".
作者 庄绪龙 刘艳
出处 《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》 2011年第1期11-14,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词 民刑交叉 立法层面 司法层面 刑进民退 Civil and Criminal Overlapping Case From Legislative Inspective Judicial Perspective Superiority of Civil Cases to Criminal Cases
  • 相关文献

同被引文献56

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部