期刊文献+

国有控股与民营控股上市公司竞争力孰强孰弱--基于公司治理与管理相匹配的视角 被引量:4

Who is More Competitive,State-owned or Private Chinese Listed Companies:From the Perspective of Matching Corporate Governance with Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 控股股东的性质对于治理行为具有重要影响,并最终决定着上市公司的竞争优势。通过对2003-2006年3590个样本的实证分析发现由于制度约束以及上市公司自发性要求,国有控股与民营控股上市公司普遍重视潜在竞争优势的培育,尤其是董事会制度的建设,治理竞争力均有显著改善。民营控股上市公司具有较强的潜在竞争优势,但由于控制权的争夺导致了上市公司财务状况不佳。国有控股上市公司由于其垄断性地位,具有较强的财务实力。国有控股上市公司应进一步优化股权结构,而民营控股上市公司大股东则应培育理性的投资意识以及联盟意识。 The nature of controlling shareholders has an important impact on corporate governance and determines ultimately the competitiveness of listed companies.Our empirical study of 3590 Chinese listed companies between 2003 and 2006 shows that both the state-owned and the private companies,in response to institutional and inner requirements,attached great importance to potential competitiveness.In particular,great attention has been paid to the construction of the board system.As a result,corporate governance has significantly improved in listed companies.Specifically,private companies have greater potential competitiveness relative to state-owned companies,but the financial performance of private companies is worse because of the fight over the right of control.State-owned companies have greater financial strength because of monopoly.Such findings imply that stated-owned companies should further optimize ownership structure while substantial shareholders of private companies should cultivate the awareness of rational investment and alliance.
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期114-120,共7页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金课题“董事会治理诊断与治理风险预警系统研究”(70672098)的资助
关键词 上市公司竞争力 治理竞争力 财务实力 Competitiveness of listed companies corporate governance competitiveness financial strength
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献17

  • 1常义.《黄曼民们上演“最后的欲望”ST宏智仅剩残皮》[N].《21世纪经济报道》,2004年6月6日. 被引量:1
  • 2汪恭彬.《ST宏智控股权之争考验公司法》[N].《21世纪经济报道》,2004年6月20日. 被引量:1
  • 3Pagano, M., A., Roell, 1998, "The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure:Agency Costs, Monitoring, and The De-cision To Go Public", The Quarterly Journal of Economics,188-225. 被引量:1
  • 4Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny., 1986, "Large Share-holders and Corporate Control", Journal of Political Econo-mr, 94, 461-488. 被引量:1
  • 5Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., 1997, "A Survey of Corporate Governance", Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783. 被引量:1
  • 6Bennedsen M., M. Fosgerau and K. Nielsen, 2003 ,"The Strategic Choice of Control Allocation and Ownership Distribution in Closely Held Corporations", Working Paper,Copenhagen Business School. 被引量:1
  • 7Bennedsen M., D. Wolfenzon, 2000, "The Balance of Power in Closely Held Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 113 -139. 被引量:1
  • 8Berle, Adolf and Gardiner Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, Macmillan. 被引量:1
  • 9Dyck Alexander and Luigi Zingales, 2004, "Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison", Journal of Finance, 59, 537-600. 被引量:1
  • 10Gomes, A. and Novaes, W., 1999, "Multiple Large Shareholders in Corporate Governance", Unpublished Work-ing Paper, The Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA. 被引量:1

共引文献219

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部