期刊文献+

经皮经肝胆管内外引流对胰腺的影响 被引量:5

Pancreatic response to PTBD and stending
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价PTBD内外引流对胰腺的影响。方法:通过对110例梗阻性黄疸行PTBD内外引流和胆总管下段经壶腹放置支架,观察患者术前术后血淀粉酶的变化,64例高位胆管梗阻行内外引流和46例低位胆管梗阻支架治疗,比较两者胰腺炎的发生率。结果:AMY升高占44.5%(49/110),35例AMY大于3倍正常值,引流组胰腺炎的发生率明显大于支架组(P<0.001)。结论:胰腺损伤和胰腺炎是PTBD较常见的并发症,胰腺损伤与引流管或支架是否通过壶腹有关。 Objective:To evaluate the response of pancreas in patients with biliary obstruction after PTBD.Methods:110 consecutive patients with unresectable biliary obstruction underwent PTBD treatments,PTBD internal-external grainage in 64 cases and inserting stent across ampullae in 46.Serum amylase(AMY) levels were measured before and after PTBD.The effects of pancreas were compared with drainage group and stending group.Results:AMY increased in 49 cases(44.9%).AMY was three times of normal baseline levels in 35 cases.The number of the patients with hyperamylasemia or panreatitis after internal-external grainage procedures was more than patients who were inserted stents(P〈0.001).Conclusion:The damnification of the pancreas is hackneyed complication of PTBD.Pancreatic response is related with grainage catheter and stent across ampullae.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2011年第2期225-228,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 胆管梗阻 介入放射学 引流 并发症 胰腺炎 PTBD Complication Amylases Pancreatitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Virgmia P, Antoni C, Joscp MB, et al. Percutaneous self-ex- panding metal stems versus endoscopic polyethylene endopros- theses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial [J]. Radiology, 2002, 225: 27-34. 被引量:1
  • 2Saiki S, Chijiiwa K, Komura M, et al. Preoperative internal biliary drainage is superior to external biliary drainage in liver regeneration and function after hepatectomy in obstructive jaundiced rats [J]. Ann Surg, 1999, 230: 655-662. 被引量:1
  • 3Maria S, Plinio R, Renon U, et al. Malignant biliary obstruc- tion: treatment with ePTFE-FEP-covered endoprostheses ni- tial technical and clinical experiences in a muhicenter trial [J]. Radiology, 2002,225 : 35-42. 被引量:1
  • 4Martin LF. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-re- lated risk factors [J]. J Pancreas, 2002, 3:169-176. 被引量:1
  • 5Dana RB, Curtis AL, John FC, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage [J]. JVIR, 2003,14:243-246. 被引量:1
  • 6Jo Vandervoort, Roy MS, Tony CK, Tham, et al. Risk fac- tors for complications after performance of ERCP [J]. Gastro- intestinal Endoscopy, 2002, 56:652-656. 被引量:1
  • 7陈珠.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998(10).828. 被引量:4
  • 8Scott JS, Anthony CV, Kenneth VR, et al. Pancreatic re- sponse to pereutaneous biliary drainage: a prospective study [J]. Radiology, 1991, 178: 343-346. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部