期刊文献+

课堂教学评价:描述取向 被引量:35

Classroom Teaching Assessment:A Descriptive Tendency
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前的教学评价研究表明,量化取向的教学评价无法兼顾教学的整体性与发展性,并且无法发挥评价的发展性功能,课堂教学评价亟待转型。描述取向的教学评价以倾听与观察、理解与解释、研究与改进为特征,能够有效的弥补量化取向教学评价的不足,从而为课堂教学评价改革提供了另一种可资借鉴的模式。学校层面在推进这一新的评价方式时,可参考"进入现场,开展描述—解释现象,揭示主题—协商改进,提供建议—提炼结论,获得启示"这一行动框架。 Currently, classroom teaching assessment need turn the direction because the quantitative tended teaching assessment can't give attention to the integrity and complexity of teaching and the development function of assessment. The features of descriptive tendency teaching assessment are listening and observation, understanding and explanation as well as research and improvement. It can remedy the shortcoming of quantitative tendency teaching assessment effectively. It provides another assessment mode for classroom teaching assessment reform. The schools can consider the proceeding framework "entering scene and giving description, explaiming phenomenology and unfolding theme, negotiating improvement and offering suggestion, abstracting conclusion and getting enlightenment" when this kind of new assessment is carried out by teaching and research group or preparing for lesson group.
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期48-52,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"素质教育课程评价体系研究"(D4JZD00025)的成果之一
关键词 课堂教学评价 倾听与观察 理解与解释 研究与改进 classroom teaching assessment, listening and observation, understanding and explanation, research and improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1裴娣娜.论我国课堂教学质量评价观的重要转换[J].教育研究,2008,29(1):17-22. 被引量:138
  • 2[德]伽达默尔著.科学时代的理性[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,1988.42. 被引量:41
  • 3[日]佐藤学.课程与教师[M].钟启泉译.北京:教育科学出版社,2003.6,120,242. 被引量:4
  • 4[美]马格丽特.赫姆莉,帕特丽夏F.卡利尼.从另一个视角看:儿童的力量和学校标准[M].仲建维译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005:89. 被引量:1
  • 5Max Van Manen. Writing in the dark: Phenomenological Studies in Interpretive Inquiry[M]. London: The Ahhouse Press,2002.86-87. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

共引文献180

同被引文献241

引证文献35

二级引证文献320

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部