摘要
对国有企业和私人企业进行多层次的博弈分析,比较不同情形下不同所有制企业间的效率差异以及社会福利含义,论证在线性需求、成本相等的假设下,国有企业过高的社会负担的确是其与私人企业利润差距的根本原因。私有化并不是解决国企低效率的充分条件,国企改革思路应放在如何把国有企业培育成真正的市场竞争主体上。即便是承认国有企业比私人企业经营成本高,国有企业仍有存在的效率基础。对于转型期的中国经济,竞争比产权更重要。
The author goes ahead the multi-level game analysis on state-owned enterprises and private enterprises,compare efficiency differences and social welfare implication between enterprises of different ownership under different situation,demonstrate that in assumptions of linear demand and cost equal,the high social burden of state-owned enterprise is indeed its fundamental reasons of profit gap with private enterprises.Privatization is not the sufficiency condition to the inefficiency of state-owned enterprises.The reform ideas should be put on how to cultivate state-owned enterprises into real market competition entities.Even if we admitted that management cost of state-owned enterprises is higher than private enterprise,the state-owned enterprise still has efficiency foundation.For the China＇s economy in transition period,the competition is more important than property.
出处
《经济与管理》
CSSCI
2011年第2期5-12,共8页
Economy and Management
基金
安徽省人文社科研究项目(2010K411)
关键词
国有经济
私人企业
竞争
效率差异
state-owned enterprises
private enterprises
competition
efficiency difference
