期刊文献+

棘突间植入物Coflex动态固定在腰椎退行性疾病治疗中的早期临床疗效 被引量:4

Application of Coflex Interlaminar-interspinous Implant in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨棘突间植入物Coflex在腰椎退行性疾病治疗中的短期疗效、应用指征及安全性。方法 27例腰椎退行性疾病患者在后路减压的同时行Coflex内固定术。应用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行疼痛评估,应用Oswestry功能障碍指数评价临床疗效。结果术后随访3~18个月(平均10.5个月),VAS疼痛评分术前6.6~9.5分(平均8.5分),术后0~5.2分(平均2.8分),Oswestry功能障碍指数术前31~84分(平均67分),术后0~63分(平均35分)。无内植物松动和脱落。按中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱学组腰背痛手术评定标准评价,优16例,良8例,可3例,优良率达88.9%。结论棘突间植入物Coflex治疗腰椎退行性疾病时近期临床症状改善效果良好,是一种可供选择的非融合性固定方法。 Objective To evaluate the effects of Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant on the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods From September 2008 to May 2010,27 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were subjected to Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant,including 14 men and 13 women with average age of 47 years (37-61 years).The diagnosis included degenerative spinal stenosis (n =17),degenerative lumbar discs (n =5) and recurrent intervertebral lumbar disc hemiation (n =1).Results The mean follow-up period was 10.5 months (range 3-18 months).The visual analogue scale (VAS) was decreased from preoperative score of 8.5 (6.6 to 9.5) to postoperative one of 2.8 (0 to 5.2).The patients’ Oswestry disability index was improved from preoperative score of 67 (31 to 84) to postoperative one of 35 (0 to 63).There was no patient with implant failure.According to clinical outcome judgement criterion of surgical treatment for low back pain formulated by the spine group of Chinese Orthopaedic Association,there was excellent outcome in 16 cases,good in 8 cases,and fair in 3 cases,with the excellent and good rate of 88.9%.Conclusion Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant could preserve the motion of stabilized segments and provide clinical improvement in patients with degenerative spinal stenosis.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期64-66,共3页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 辽宁省教育厅高校科研计划项目(2008842)
关键词 棘突间植入物 脊柱非融合技术 腰椎退行性疾病 interlaminar-interspinous implant spinal non-fusion degenerative lumbar disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1贺仕雄,姚国荣,韩毅,李剑锋,蔡力,刘源,袁九安.脊柱融合术后继发邻近节段退行性变的原因分析及治疗策略[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2008,23(6):459-461. 被引量:9
  • 2杨惠林 唐天驷.腰椎不稳与腰椎管狭窄专题研讨会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(1):65-65. 被引量:240
  • 3Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The relationship of structural pathology to the nerve ruot[J]. Spine, 1984,9( 1 ): 49-52. 被引量:1
  • 4Whitesldes TE. The effect of an interspinous implant on interverte- bral disc pressures [ J ]. Spine, 2003,28 ( 16 ) : 1906-1907. 被引量:1
  • 5Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP,et al. The treatment mecha- nism of an interspinous pracess implant for lumbar neurogenic inter- minent claudication [ J ]. Spine, 2005,30(7 ) : 744-749. 被引量:1
  • 6Wilke H J, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of differ- ent lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pres- sure[ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2008,17( 8 ) : 1049-1056. 被引量:1
  • 7Wiseman CM, Lindsey DP, Fredrlck AD, et al. The effect of an inter- spinous process implant on facet loading during extension[J ]. Spine, 2005,30(8) : 903-907. 被引量:1
  • 8邱志杰,杨惠林,杨同其.Coflex固定治疗L_(4~5)椎管狭窄及不稳的近期临床疗效分析[J].重庆医学,2010,39(1):76-77. 被引量:11
  • 9Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) use to stabilize the lumbar spine [J]. J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15(3 ) : 167-172. 被引量:1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Hayashi T, Arizono T, Fujimoto T, et al. Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation a minimum 4-year follow-up [ J]. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi,2008,99(5) : 107. 被引量:1
  • 2Kumar MN,Jacquot F, Hall H. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease[J]. Eur Spine J,2001 ;10(4):309. 被引量:1
  • 3Schaeren S,Broger l,Jeanneret B. Minimum four year follow up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolis thesis trealed with decompression and dynamic stabilization[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2008,33(18) :E636. 被引量:1
  • 4Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. lnterspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3) : 255. 被引量:1
  • 5Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, et al. Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis:a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short term results [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2004,29(7) : 735. 被引量:1
  • 6Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA,et al. A prospective randomized multicenter study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year resuhs[J]. Eur Spine J, 2004, 13(1) :22. 被引量:1
  • 7Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbm neurogenic intermittent claudication [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2005,30(7) :744. 被引量:1
  • 8Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure[J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17 (8) :1049. 被引量:1
  • 9Kettler A, Drumm J, Heuer F, et al. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanieal in vitro study resulting Jn a new idea[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008,23 (2): 242. 被引量:1
  • 10Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of aninterspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine[J]. J Surg Orlhop Adv, 2006, 15 (3) :167. 被引量:1

共引文献257

同被引文献69

  • 1金大地,赵亮,瞿东滨,陈建庭,江建明.腰椎间盘人工髓核置换术后中期疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(5):326-330. 被引量:21
  • 2Weinhoffer S L, Guyer R D, Herbert M, et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study [ J ]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976) , 1995,20 ( 5 ) :526-531. 被引量:1
  • 3Celik H, Derincek A, Koksal I. Surgical treatment of the spinal ste- nosis with an interspinous distraction device : do we really restore the foraminal height[ J]. Turk Neurosurg ,2012,22 (1) :50-54. 被引量:1
  • 4Wilke H J, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of dif- ferent lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure[ J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17 ( 8 ) : 1049-1056. 被引量:1
  • 5Richter A, Sehutz C, Hauek M, et al. Does an interspinous device (COFLEX) improve the outcome of deeompressive surgery in lum- bar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case con- trol study of 60 patients[J]. Eur Spine J,2010,19(2) :283-289. 被引量:1
  • 6Kong D S,Kim E S,Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after in- terspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with seg- mental instability [ J ]. J Korean Med Sci,2007,22 ( 2 ) :330-335. 被引量:1
  • 7Sehoenfeld A J. Adjaeent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion:risk faetors and implications for elinieal praetiee[ J ]. Spine J,2011,11(1) :21-23. 被引量:1
  • 8Yang J Y,Lee J K,Song H S. The impact of adjacent segment de- generation on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion [ J]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2008,33 ( 5 ) :503-507. 被引量:1
  • 9Adoqwa O, Owens R, Karikari I, et al. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosisi. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis [ J]. Neurosurg Spine, 2012,24(5 ) : 1343- 1351. 被引量:1
  • 10Kim H J, Kang K T, Moon S H, et al. The quantitative as- sessment of risk factors to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion: removal of posterior ligments and pedi- cle screws[J]. Spine, 2011,36(17) :1367-1373. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部