期刊文献+

新辅助化疗乳腺癌患者靶控输注依托咪酯意识消失时效应室靶浓度的EC50 被引量:2

Effcet-site EC50 for etomidate by target-controlled infusion at loss of consciousness in breast cancer patients who accepted adjuvant chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测定新辅助化疗后患者靶控输注(target-controlled infusion,TCI)依托咪酯意识消失时的半数效应室靶浓度(ECm)。方法90例ASAI或Ⅱ级,同时期行乳腺癌切除手术的乳腺癌患者,根据术前是否接受新辅助化疗以及化疗方案分为未化疗组(I组),紫杉醇化疗4周期组(Ⅱ组),药物联合化疗4周期组(Ⅲ组)。按序贯法给予依托咪酯靶控输注10min,相邻效应室靶浓度之间比率为1.25。结果未化疗组患者意识消失的半数效应室靶浓度(EC。)为0.58mg/L,95%可信区间为0.53mg,L~0.63mg/L。紫杉醇化疗组患者意识消失的Ec50为0.34mg/L,95%可信区间为0.32mg/L~0.37mg/L。药物联合化疗组患者意识消失的Ec50为0.35mg/L,95%可信区间为0.32mgCL~0.39mg/L。结论乳腺癌新辅助化疗后患者靶控输注依托咪酯时意识消失的EC50低于未化疗患者。 Objective To determine the Effcet-site EC50 of etomidate to cause loss of consciousness in patients who accepted adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods According to the therapeutic method before their operation,ninety breast cancer patients undergoing elective operations were allocated to 3 groups: non-adjuvant chemotherapy group (group I ,n=30), Taxol group (group Ⅱ ,n=30),Adriamycine+Cyclophosphamide+5-Fu group (group Ⅲ,n=30). TCI etomidate was given by"up and down "method for l0 min in each group. The ration of two close effect-site concentrations was 1.25. Record the state of consciousness of each patient. Results The EC50 in non-adjuvant chemotherapy group was 0.58 mg/L, the 95% confidence level was 0.53 mg/L-0.63 mg/L. The ECs0 in Taxol group was 0.34 mg/L,the 95% confidence level was 0.32 mg/L-0.37 mg/L. The EC50 in non-adjuvant chemotherapy group was0.35μg/ml,the 95% confidence level was0.32mg/L-0.39 mg/L. Conclusion The ECs0 of etomidte to cause loss of consciousness in adjuvant chemotherapy group is low than control group.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2011年第1期48-50,124,共4页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基金 基金项目:北京肿瘤医院院内基金资助(08-09)
关键词 依托咪酯 靶控输注 意识消失 半数有效效应室浓度 Etomidate,TCI Unconsciousness EC50
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Miln e SE, Troy A, Irwin MG, et al. Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points. Br J Anaesth, 2003, 90(2): 127-131. 被引量:1
  • 2马新刚,刘芳,岳云.同等药效学指标下依托咪酯与丙泊酚脑电双频指数值的比较[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2009,30(4):294-296. 被引量:6
  • 3杨树勤主编..医学统计学 2[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1985:249.
  • 4邱献华,王海学.新辅助化疗加手术治疗乳腺癌的临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(9):1071-1073. 被引量:8
  • 5陈新谦,金有豫,汤光主编..新编药物学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:1004.
  • 6Zsigmond EK, Robins G. The effect of a series of anticancer drugs on plasma cholinesterase activity. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1972, 19 (1): 75-82. 被引量:1
  • 7Rajasekhar A, George TJ Jr. Gemcitabine-induced reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Oncologist, 2007, 12( 11 ) : 1332-1335. 被引量:1
  • 8Martin G, Bellido L, Cruz JJ. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome induced by sunitinib. J Clin Oneol, 2007, 25 (23): 3559. 被引量:1
  • 9Kastrup O, Diener HC. TNF- antagonist etanercept induced reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol, 2008, 255(3): 452-453. 被引量:1
  • 10Onujiogu N, Lengyel E, Yamada SD. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome following intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin chemotherapy for fallopian tube cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 111(3): 537-539. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

共引文献12

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部