期刊文献+

低套囊压力下ProSeal或Supreme喉罩用于腹腔镜手术患者气道管理的效果 被引量:9

Efficacy of laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and Supreme under low cuff pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价低套囊压力下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩用于腹腔镜手术患者气道管理的效果.方法 择期仰卧位腹腔镜手术患者60例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄20~70岁,体重50~80 kg,随机分为ProSeal喉罩组(P组)和Supreme喉罩组(S组),每组30例.喉罩置入成功后,用手持测压计监测套囊充气压力并维持其为35 cm H2O,记录气道密闭压及气腹前后机械通气时气道压峰值和平均气道压,记录术后并发症的发生情况.结果 两组气腹后机械通气时气道压峰值高于气腹前(P<0.05),两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术中气腹前后均无漏气现象发生;两组气道密闭压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组拔除喉罩后表面带有血丝及术后咽痛发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论低套囊压力(35 cm H2O)下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩通气效果均较好,可安全地用于腹腔镜手术患者的气道管理. Objective To assess the efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Proseal (LMA Proseal) and Supreme (LMA Supreme) used in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery when the cuff-pressure was 35 cm H2O.Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 20-70 yr, weighing 50-80 kg, undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, were randomized into2 groups (n = 30 each): LMA ProSeal group (group P) and LMA Supreme group (group S). After the LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme were inserted in group P and S respectively, the cuff pressure was monitored and maintained at 35 cm H2O by manipulate manometer. The airway sealing pressure, peak and mean airway pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation and the complications were also recorded. Results The peak airway pressure was significantly higher after pneumoperitoneum than before pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation (P 〈 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the peak airway pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05). The air leakage had never happened before or after pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in the airway sealing pressure between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of throat pain between the two groups(P〉0.05).Conclusion When the cuff pressure is 35 cm H2O, the LMA ProSeal and Supreme can provide adequate ventilation during operation with fewer complications and can be used safely for laparoscopic surgery.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期1236-1238,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(2007-1037)
关键词 喉面罩 呼吸 人工 腹腔镜检查 套囊压力 Laryngeal masks Respiration, artificial Laparoscopy Cuff pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, et al. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia, 2004, 59 ( 7 ) : 675-694. 被引量:1
  • 2Murdoch H, Cook TM. Effective ventilation during CPR via an LMA- Supreme. Anaesthesia, 2008,63 (3) : 326. 被引量:1
  • 3Timmermann A, Cremer S, Heuer J', et al. Laryngeal mask LMA Su- preme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management. Anaesthesist,2008,57(10) :970-975. 被引量:1
  • 4Choi YM, Cha SM, Kang H, et al. The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) compared with the la- ryngeal mask airway ProSeal during general anesthesia. Korean J An- esthesiot, 2010,58 (5) : 450-457. 被引量:1
  • 5Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a ran- domized,crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed,anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology,2000, 93(1): 104- 109. 被引量:1
  • 6Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, et at. hnpact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in chil- dren. Paediatr Anaesth, 2009, !9 (5) : 464-469. 被引量:1
  • 7Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, et al. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth, 1999,82(2): 286-287. 被引量:1
  • 8Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, et al. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngcal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology, 2010,112 (3) : 652- 657. 被引量:1
  • 9Lee AK, Tey JB, Lira Y, et al. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable Pro.Seal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecolog- ical laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009,37 (5) : 815- 819. 被引量:1

同被引文献58

  • 1徐懋,张利萍.ProSeal喉罩在颈椎后路手术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1203-1205. 被引量:2
  • 2张延钧,田嘉欣,郑鑫.不同充气量喉罩置入方法的比较[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(16):4899-4900. 被引量:3
  • 3岳云,田鸣,左明章,等主译.喉罩麻醉原理与实践[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:264. 被引量:7
  • 4Richez B,Saltel L,Banchereau F,et al.A new single usesupraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophagealvent:an observational study of the i-gel[J].Anesth Analg,2008,106(4):1137-1139. 被引量:1
  • 5Uppal V,Fletcher G,Kinsella J.Comparison of the i-gel with thecuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation[J].Br JAnaesth,2009,102(2):264-268. 被引量:1
  • 6Seet E,Rajeev S,Firoz T,et al.Safety and efficacy of laryngeal maskairway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal:a randomizedcontrolled trial[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2010,27(7):602-607. 被引量:1
  • 7Shin WJ,Cheong YS,Yang HS,et al.The supraglottic airwayI-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classiclaryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients[J].Eur JAnaesthesiol,2010,27(7):598-601. 被引量:1
  • 8Teoh WH,Lee KM,Suhitharan T,et al.Comparison of the LMAsupreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecologicallaparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation[J].Anaesthesia,2010,65(12):1173-1179. 被引量:1
  • 9Taheri A,Hajimohamadi F,Soltanghoraee H,et al.Complicationsof using laryngeal mask airway during anaesthesia in patientsundergoing major ear surgery[J].Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2009,29(3):151-155. 被引量:1
  • 10庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:475-487. 被引量:251

引证文献9

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部