期刊文献+

美国联邦最高法院与德国联邦宪法法院违宪审查权之比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Power of Unconstitutional Examination of the Supreme Federal court of the US and the German Federal Constitutional Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国联邦最高法院的违宪审查权是其审判权的一个有机组成部分,它的违宪裁决对美国联邦最高法院及其下级法院以及案件当事人有拘束力。德国联邦宪法法院的违宪审查权独立于德国普通法院的审判权,是一种监督立法权、行政权、普通法院司法权的政治性权力,它的违宪裁决具有普遍的拘束力。 The antecedant of theory of investing the supreme federal court of the US with the power of unconstitutional examination is ancient natural law philosophy,the idea of common law of england,and legal thought of kirk.Theory of recht of kelsen provide theoretical base for the power of uncostitutional examination of German federal constitutional court.The power of unconstitutional examination of the supreme federal court of the US is an intergral component of judicial power of the supreme federal court of the US.The unconstitutional adjudication of the supreme federal court of the US is binding on the supreme federal court of the US,it's lower court and litigious party.The power of unconstitutional examination of German federal constitutional court is indepenent of the judicial power of ordinary court in German,is a political power of monitoring law-making power,administrative power and executive power.The unconstitutional adjudication of German federal constitutional court has general legal effect,the unconstitutional adjudication of criminal substantive law of German federal constitutional court has retroactive effect.
作者 莆方合
出处 《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期16-20,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 违宪审查权 美国联邦最高法院 德国联邦宪法法院 性质 拘束力 power of unconstitutional examination the supreme federal court of the US German federal constitutional court characteristic binding force
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献71

  • 1[意]莫诺.卡佩莱蒂.比较法视野中的司法程序[M].徐昕,王奕.北京:清华大学出版社,2005. 被引量:5
  • 2黄昭元.宪法权利限制的司法审查标准-美国类型化标准模式的比较分析.台湾大学法学论丛,(3). 被引量:1
  • 3[美]伯纳德.施瓦茨.美国最高法院史[M].毕洪海,柯种,石明磊,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005. 被引量:1
  • 4李建良.论基本权利的位阶次序与司法审查标准[C]∥.刘孔中,陈新民.宪法解释之理论与实务(第三辑).台北中央研究院中山人文社会科学研究所专书(52),2002:167. 被引量:1
  • 5T. Alexander Aleinikoff. Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing [DB/OL]. Yale L. J. Vol. 96, No. 5 (Apr. , 1987). 被引量:1
  • 6Iddo Porat. The Transformation of American Constitutional Balancing. [J/OL] http ://law bepress. com/expresso/eps. 被引量:1
  • 7[美]路易斯.亨金,阿尔伯特.J.罗森塔尔.宪政与权利-美国宪法的域外影响[M].郑戈,译.北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,1996:22. 被引量:1
  • 8Kathleen M. Sullivan. The Supreme Court, 1991 Term - Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards[ DB/OL]. Harv. L. Rev. 22- 123 (1992). 被引量:1
  • 9Pierre Schlag. Rules and Standards[ DB/OL]. UCLA L. Rev. 379 -430 (Dec. , 1955). 被引量:1
  • 10Melville B. Nimmer. The Right to Speak Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy [ DB/OL]. 56 Cal. L. Rev. 935 (1968). 被引量:1

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部