期刊文献+

穿刺置管引流与传统手术治疗乳腺脓肿的疗效比较 被引量:12

Comparison of therapeutic effects of catheter drainage and traditional surgical drainage for the treatment of breast abscess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察超声引导穿刺置管引流与传统手术引流治疗乳腺脓肿的临床疗效,并对其进行比较,评价各自的临床应用价值.方法 64例乳腺脓肿患者根据自愿分成两组:超声引导穿刺置管引流治疗组(A组)和传统手术引流治疗组(B组).比较两组的治疗效果并观察各组患者切口愈合时间,换药次数,疼痛分级,瘢痕长度以及继续哺乳的例数等指标.结果 超声引导穿刺置管引流组手术切口愈合时间(13.4±4.2)d,换药次数(4.3±1.5)次,疼痛程度评分(3.4±1.3),瘢痕长度(1.3±0.7)cm,脓腔愈合时间(10.7±5.4)d,78.1%的患者能继续哺乳,上述方面均优于传统手术引流治疗组(P<0.01).结论 超声引导穿刺置管引流治疗乳腺脓肿可以缩短愈合时间,减少换药次数,减轻疾病痛苦,保护乳房功能和美观,是治疗乳腺脓肿较为理想的方法. Objective To observe the clinical effect of ultrasound - guided catheter drainage and traditional surgical drainage in the treatment of breast abscess. Methods A total of 64 patients with breast abscess were divided into two groups according to the patients'will:the ultrasound guided catheter drainage group (group A) and traditional surgical drainage group (group B). Wound healing time and number of dressing change, pain rating, scar length and the number of patients to continue breast - feeding and other indicators were compared between the two groups. Results The wound healing time [ ( 13.4 ± 4.2) d ] and number of dressing change [ (4.3 ± 1.5 ) ], pain score [ (3.4 ± 1.3 ) ], scar size [ (1.3 ± 0.7 ) cm ], abscess healing time [ (10.7 ± 5.4) d] and the percentage of the patients to recover breast- feeding(78.1% ) in the group A were improved greatly as compared with those in the group B (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Ultrasound guided catheter drainage in the treatment of breast abscess can shorten healing time, reduce the number of dressing change and protect the breast function and appearance. It is an ideal treatment method for breast abscess.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2010年第12期811-813,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 乳腺脓肿 超声引导 穿刺 引流 breast abscess ultrasound guidance puncture drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献24

  • 1蔡守旺,刘志伟,周宁新,贺书杰,黄志强.术后腹部脓肿经窦道的介入引流治疗[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(9):848-849. 被引量:2
  • 2严松莉,唐旭平,曹亚丽.积乳囊肿的超声分型和声像图特征[J].中国超声医学杂志,2006,22(2):99-101. 被引量:10
  • 3王颀,陈中扬.微创技术在乳腺外科的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(9):661-663. 被引量:6
  • 4黎介寿,吴孟超,黄志强.通外科手术学[M].2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2006:77-79. 被引量:1
  • 5Van Goor H.Interventional management of abdominal sepsis:when and how[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2002,387 (5 -6):191 -200. 被引量:1
  • 6Jaffe TA,Nelson RC,Delong DM,et al.Practice patterns in percutaneous image-guided intraabdominal abscess drainage:survey of academic and private practice centers[J].Radiology,2004,233(3):750 -756. 被引量:1
  • 7Buckley BT,Goodwin M,Boardman P,et al.Percutaneous abscess drainage in the UK:A national survey and single centre study[J].Clin Radiol,2006,61 (1):55 -64. 被引量:1
  • 8Maher MM,Gervais DA,Kalra MK,et al.The inaccessible or undrainable abscess:how to drain it[J].Radiographics,2004,24(3):717 -735. 被引量:1
  • 9Cinat ME,Wilson SE,Din AM.Determinants for successful percutaneous image-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscess[J].Arch Sur8,2002,37 (7):845-849. 被引量:1
  • 10Gervais DA,Ho CH,O' Neill MJ,et al.Recurrent abdominal and pelvic abscesses:incidence,results of repeated percutaneous drainage,and underlying causes in 956 drainages[J].Am J Roentgenol,2004,182 (2):463-466. 被引量:1

共引文献51

同被引文献83

引证文献12

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部