期刊文献+

标准通道经皮肾输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂肾结石 被引量:1

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy via the standard tract for patients with complex kidney calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨标准通道经皮肾输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂肾结石的疗效及安全性。方法:总结2009年4月-2009年12月采用标准通道经皮肾输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂肾结石36例39侧临床资料。结果:本组35例38侧成功行I期PCNL,手术时间30-180min(平均86±34min),出血约30-500m(l平均110±20ml)。其中8例残留结石大于1.0cm,术后5-7天行局麻下二期手术清除残石,总结石清除率92.1%(35/38),ESWL治疗3例。1例孤立肾铸型结石并肾积水、肾功能不全,经皮肾穿刺置入F8单J管引流,二期行标准通道PCNL术。所有病例随访1-3月,无严重手术并发症。结论:标准通道经皮肾输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗复杂肾结石,具有安全、效率高、创伤小、恢复快的特点,并可明显减低医疗成本。 Objective:To investigate the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy via the standard tract on patients with complex kidney calculi.Methods:Form April 2009 to September 2009,36 patients with complex renal calculi underwent standard tract PCNL by pneumatic lithotripsy.Their clinical data were reviewed retrospect-tively.Results:Phase I lithotripsy were performed on all the cases.The mean operation time were 86±34min(range 30-180min),and the mean blood loss was 110±20 ml(30~500ml).8 cases had residual stones(≥1.0cm) were cleared by Phase II lithotr-ipsy,3 cases were treated by ESWL,and the total clearance was 92.1%(35/38).Nephrostomy was performed on one case,who had complex calculi in solitary kidney,and Phase II lithotripsy was underwent standard tract PCNL.After following up for 1 to 3 months,there were no severe comp-lications.Conclusion:Treatment of complex renal calculi with standard tract percutaneous nep-hrolithotomy was effective,safe,and obviously reduced the medical cost.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2010年第23期4533-4534,4558,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 肾结石 标准通道 经皮肾镜取石术 Renal calculi Standard tract Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1曾国华,李逊,何朝辉,单炽昌,袁坚,陈文忠,王露萍,吴开俊.微创经皮肾取石术和传统经皮肾镜取石术对肾皮质损伤的比较[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1551-1552. 被引量:118
  • 2曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.微创经皮肾穿刺取石术中肾盂内压变化的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(2):101-103. 被引量:155
  • 3Olbert P,Weber J,Hegele A,et al.Combining lithoclast and ultrasound power in one device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy:in vitro results of a novel and highly effective technology.Urology,2003,61:55-59. 被引量:1
  • 4Auge B K,Lallas C D,Pietrow P K,et al.In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device.Urology,2002,60:28-32. 被引量:1
  • 5Hofmann R,Olbert P,Weber J,et al.Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy.BJU Int,2002,90:16-19. 被引量:1
  • 6Pietrow P K,Auge B K,Zhong P,et al.Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite.J Urol,2003,169:1247-1249. 被引量:1
  • 7Kuo R L,Siqueira T M,Mcateer J A,et al.The new swiss lithoclast master:in-vitro assessment of setting efficiencies.J Urol,2002 (167 Suppl):367 (abstract 1460). 被引量:1
  • 8Landman J, Venkatesh R, Ragab M, et al. Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath. Urology, 2002, 60: 584-587. 被引量:1
  • 9Troxel SA, Low RK. Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol, 2002, 168: 1348-1351. 被引量:1
  • 10Zeng GH, Zhong W, Li X, et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17: 307-310. 被引量:1

共引文献617

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部