摘要
但凡述及某个概念,伽达默尔必回到历史,或引柏拉图说法,或引康德、黑格尔等论述,听取前人讲法的道理。这基本上代表了大陆哲学从事概念考察的典型做法——概念史研究(Begriffsgeschichte)。与之相对,作为分析哲学代表的维特根斯坦则采取了另一种概念考察进路——他几乎从不引任何大哲学家讲法,而是回到自然语言,探寻概念中的自然理解,即语法考察(Grammatische Untersuchung)。让我们感兴趣的是,这两种做法如何各行其道、并行不悖,两种进路的实质究竟是什么?
When discussing certain concept,Gadamer always went back to history,by appealing to such famous philosophers as Plato,Kant or Hegel etc,and listening to their understandings——which represents a typical way of conceptual Investigation：Begriffsgeschichte.In contrast to this,wittgenstein took a different way of conceptual Investigation——he never quoted famous philosophers,rather went back to natural language and tried to seek the natural understanding within concepts——which was expressed in his ＂grammatische Untersuchung＂.What interested us is how such different ways can co-exist and what essences these two ways are.This paper tries to give some answers to these questions.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期140-145,共6页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
概念考察
伽达默尔
概念史
维特根斯坦
语法考察
Begriffsgeschichte
Gadamer
Grammatische Untersuchung
Wittgenstein
The Conceptual Investigation Whereas
