摘要
加害人不明时的高空抛物致人损害,《侵权责任法》第87条规定由可能加害的建筑物使用人给予补偿。这一制度设计在法理上无法证成其正当性;如果以可能加害的建筑物使用人违反协助查找义务和作证义务,要求其对受害人承担私法上的侵权责任,则是混淆了公法、私法两种不同的法律责任。另外,该条也不符合侵权行为的构成要件。故,《侵权责任法》第87条应该删除,应由刑法和社会法分担该条的救济功能。
According to Article 87 of the Tort Liability Law,when the tort party is unidentified in the case of tort by dropping objects,the user of building which has the potential to tort should compensate the injured party.The legitimacy of such a stipulation could not be proved by the principle of law.To request the user of the building to assume the tort liability in private law because he or she refuses to help with investigation and to testify is to blend the different legal liabilities of public law and private law.In addition,the stipulation goes against the elements of tort acts.Therefore Article 87 of the Tort Liability Law should be removed,and its remedial function should be performed by the criminal law and social law.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期113-119,共7页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
高空抛物
侵权
建筑物使用人
法律救济
dropping objects in high buildings
infringement
user of a building
legal remedy
