期刊文献+

计算机仿真系统评估方案研究 被引量:1

Research on evaluation scheme for computer simulation system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分布式交互是实现复杂系统仿真的重要手段,各个成员仿真系统的性能至关重要,现有评估方法主要关注于仿真系统、模型的正确性和可信度,而没有从全面综合的角度来分析仿真系统自身的质量。因此,建立了能够整体评估仿真系统性能的指标体系,构建了仿真系统二级模糊综合评估模型,并应用该模型对野营保障模拟训练系统进行了评估分析,得出了较为合理的评估结论,验证了评估方案的可行性和易操作性。 Distributed interaction is an important method to simulate complex system.So the performance of every simulation system member is crucial.Current evaluation methods pay much attention to the validity and credibility,but they do not analyze the quality of simulation system in terms of general and comprehensive aspects.Accordingly,an indicator system to evaluate the overall performance of simulation system is given.And a two-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for simulation system is presented.Moreover this model is applied to estimate and analyze camping service simulation and training system.The reasonable evaluation conclusion is obtained,which validates the feasibility and operability of this evaluation scheme.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期246-248,共3页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 重庆市自然科学基金(No.CSTC2009BB2346)~~
关键词 仿真系统 评估方案 指标体系 评估模型 simulation system evaluation scheme indicator system evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Liu F, Yang M, Wang Z C.VV & A solution for complex simulation systems[J].International Journal of Simulation: System, Science and Technology, 2008,9 ( 1 ):21-29. 被引量:1
  • 2吴晓燕,刘兴堂,任淑红.仿真系统VV&A研究[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(5):91-94. 被引量:8
  • 3Jalal N,Vlatka H,Ray J P.Criteria for simulation software evaluation[C]//Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 1998:399-406. 被引量:1
  • 4Tamrat W T, Alexander V, Edwin V,et al.An evaluation and selection methodology for discrete-event simulation software[C]// Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, 2002: 67-75. 被引量:1
  • 5刘飞,马萍,杨明,王子才.复杂仿真系统可信度量化研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(1):1-3. 被引量:19
  • 6张瀚.多Agent野营保障模拟训练系统研究[D].重庆:后勤工程学院,2008. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Department of Defense. Verification Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) Recommended Practice Guide [ EB/OL]. http.//www. msiac, dmso. mil/vva/, 1996,12. 被引量:1
  • 2Department of Defense. VV&A Recommended Practice Guides, BUILD 2 [ EB/OL ]. http.//www, msiac, dmso. mil/vva/, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 3IEEE 1278.4. IEEE Standards for Distributed Interactive Simulation- Verification, Validation and Accreditation[ S]. 被引量:1
  • 4Department of Defense. DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) [ EB/OL] http ://www. msiac, dmso. mil/vva/, 1996,4. 被引量:1
  • 5ARTHUR J D, SARGENT R G, DBNEY J B, et al. Verification and validation: what impact should project size and complexity have on attendant V&V activities and supporting infrastructure [ C ]//Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference. Phoenix, AZ: IEEE, 1999:148 - 155. 被引量:1
  • 6PACE D K, SHEEHAN J. Subject matter expert (SME)/peer use in M&S V&V [ C]//Foundations for V&V in the 21st Century Workshop ( Foundations' 02).Laurel, Maryland: [ s. n. ], 2002. 被引量:1
  • 7YANG Jian Bo, SEN P. Multiple attribute design evaluation of complex engineering products using the evidential reasoning approach [ J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 1997, 8 (3) : 211 -230. 被引量:1
  • 8PAWLAK Z. Rough sets : Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data [ M ]. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. 被引量:1
  • 9SHAFER G. A mathematical theory of evidence [ M ].Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976. 被引量:1
  • 10魏华梁,王肇敏,刘藻珍,李钟武.系统仿真置信度研究中的若干问题与准则[J].系统仿真学报,2000,12(1):39-42. 被引量:31

共引文献24

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部