期刊文献+

美国商业方法专利争论及司法实践最新发展 被引量:8

Controversy and Recent Development of Judicature on the Protection for Business Method Patent in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对支持或反对商业方法专利学者们争论的主要问题进行了归纳总结,简介了Bilski案及美国商业方法专利的最新政策。在此基础上,提出赋予商业方法专利权可以促进相关部门的技术创新,解决美国商业方法专利问题应当是积极寻求改进专利审查的方案,同时中国应主动借鉴国外的立法与实践,建立起商业方法专利保护制度。 As far as the protection for business method patent are concerned,there is much divergence in the research of international legislation and judicature.The field of theory has probed this issue for many years.This paper summarizes key controversy to for or against the protection for business method patent and introduces briefly Bilski case for understanding the latest development of this policy.Based on this,this paper puts forward the protection for business method can accelerate technical innovation of related industries.Also,USPTO should seek the scheme improving patent examination positively.Furthermore,it is essential to establish the system of protection for business method patent in China.
作者 张玉蓉
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期155-160,共6页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家留学基金 上海大学创新基金项目
关键词 商业方法专利 Bilski案 专利质量 经济效率 business method patent Bilski case patent quality economic efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Allison J. R., Tiller E. H. The business method patent myth [J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2003, (18):5-27. 被引量:1
  • 2Lee N. Patent eligible subject matter reconfiguration and the emergence of proprietarian norms-the patent eligibility of business methods [J]. IDEA-The Journa of Law and Technology, 2005, (45):321-359. 被引量:1
  • 3Hunter S. D. Have business method patents gotten a bum rap? Some empirical evidence [EB/OL]. Working Paper. http://papers. ssrn.com/so13/papers.efm?abstract_id=424081, 2010-5-12. 被引量:1
  • 4Fine G.. To issue or not to issue: analysis of the business method patent controversy on the intemet[J]. BCL Review. 2001, (42): 1195-1213. 被引量:1
  • 5Hunt R.M. You can patent that? Are patents on computer programs and business methods good for the new economy [J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review,2001, (1):5-15. 被引量:1
  • 6Quinn E. R. The proliferation of electronic commerce: don't blame the PTO [J]. Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2002, (28):121-153. 被引量:1
  • 7Dreyfuss R. Examining State Street Bank: developments in business method patenting [J]. Computer und Recht International, 2001, (1):1-9. 被引量:1
  • 8Heller M. A., Eisenberg R. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research [J].Science, 1998, (5):698- 701. 被引量:1
  • 9Hall B., Graham S., Harhoff D, Mowery, D. Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via post-grant opposition[EB/OL]. Working Paper. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9731. 2003,2010-5-12. 被引量:1
  • 10Thurm S.. Amazonlcom chief executive urges shorter duration for Internet patents [N]. WALL ST1J1,2000-03-10(B31). 被引量:1

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部