期刊文献+

国际私法中规则和标准之争的经济学分析 被引量:3

Economics Analysis of the Dispute between "Rules" and "Standards" in Private International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际私法规范是应该主要表现为"规则"还是应该表现为"标准"引起了很大的争论,传统的理论分析在这个问题上并没有得出令人满意的结论。20世纪60年代经济学的方法被引进到国际私法领域中,并且首先被运用到对规则和标准合理性的论证中,现有的经济分析并没有给人们清晰的思路来解决规则和标准的争论。要想用经济学的方法来解决国际私法关于规则和标准之间的争论,必须深入到规则和标准的经济学本质并结合国际私法的实际,才能得出科学的结论。 From the birth of private international law in 13th century, the dispute between rules and standards is its focus. The traditional analysis of this topic does not supply a satisfying conclusion. In the 1960s’, the methods of economics was introduced in the field of private international law, and first of all, it was applied on the dispute between the rules and standards. But the existing analysis of economics does not make a very clear trend of thought. If we want to use this method to resolve the problem of rules and standards, it’s necessary to find out the economics essence of rules and standards; what’s more, we must combine the features of private international law to draw a scientific conclusion.
作者 田洪鋆
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期74-81,共8页 Law and Social Development
关键词 国际私法 规则 标准 经济分析 private international law rules standards economics analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1William F. Baxter. Choice of Law and the Federal System [J]. Stanford Law Review, 1963, (16). 被引量:1
  • 2[美]理查德·A·波斯纳 张文显 译.法律的经济分析[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.. 被引量:99
  • 3Erin Ann O' Hara, Larry E. Ribstein. Conflict of Laws and Choice of Law [ A ]. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics [ C ]. Chehenham : Edward Elgar, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 4Micheal J. Whincop, Mary Keyes. Policy and Pragmatism in the Conflict of Laws [ M ]. Canberra: Dartmouth Publishing Company, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 5Erin A. O' Hara, Larry E. Ribstein. From Politics to Efficiency in Choice of Law [ J ]. University of Chicago Law Review, 2000, (67). 被引量:1
  • 6Solimine, Walker. Constitutional Litigation in Federal and State Courts: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Parity [ J ]. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 1983, !!0!.._ .. 被引量:1
  • 7Lea. Brilmayer. Interest Analysis and the Myth of Legislative Intent [J]. Michigan Law Review, 1980, (78). 被引量:1
  • 8L. Kaplow. Rules versus Standards, An Economic Analysis [J]. Duke Law Journal, 1992, (15). 被引量:1
  • 9P. A. Posner. Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development [A]. World Bank Research Observer [C]. 1995, (13). 被引量:1
  • 10L. Kaplow. General Characteristics of Rules [ A ]. Encyclopedia of law and Economics [ C ]. Chehenham: Edward Elgar, 2000. 被引量:1

共引文献98

同被引文献113

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部