期刊文献+

美国对华战略认知改变了吗?——析后冷战时代美国对中国国家身份的认知

Have US Strategic Cognitions on China Changed? An Analysis on U.S.Cognitions on China’s National Identity in the Post-Cold War Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 冷战后,随着国际环境的变化,美国实力的变迁以及中国崛起的现实,美国政府对中国国家身份的认知也经历了由感性认识到理性认识逐步深化的过程。这一变化过程既是美国因应国际政治格局变革的战略需要,也是两国国家行为互动的必然结果。美国对中国国家身份认知的调整突出反映了当前中美关系既相互竞争又相互依存的复合型特点。当前中美关系发展虽然遇到了诸多困境,但奥巴马政府对华战略认知并未发生根本性变化,而是体现出一定的连续性与稳定性。在评估两国关系时,这一要素不应被忽视。 To cognize and construct other nation's identity is one of the main variables for the US government in formulating foreign strategy.After the Cold War,with the changes in the international environment,American power and reality of China's rise,the US government's recognition of China's national identity has also evolved progressively from perceptual knowledge to rational knowledge.The changing process is not only for US strategic requirements in response to international political landscape changes,but also the inevitable result of interactions between the two countries.The adjustment of US cognitions on China's national identity highlights the compound characteristics of China-US relations,that is,competing with while being interdependent of each other.Though there exist some troubles in developing China-US relations,Obama's strategic cognitions on China has not radically changed,but rather reflect continuity and stability to a certain degree,which should not be neglected,when we review the current bilateral relations.
作者 陈积敏
机构地区 外交学院
出处 《和平与发展》 2010年第6期34-39,共6页 Peace and Development
基金 外交学院王帆教授主持的“国家社科重点研究课题:美国对中国的中长期战略研究”的阶段性成果,项目号为08AGJ002
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Bill Gertz,"China policy fight",The Washington Times,October 20,2010,http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/20/insidethe-ring-875212385/print/ (visited on November 15,2010). 被引量:1
  • 2即中国崛起挑战美国霸权和中国崛起与美国霸权共存.美国对中国崛起的认知与反应.和平与发展,2009,(1). 被引量:1
  • 3"Excerpts From Pentagon' s Plan:'Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival'",http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/1990s/nyt030892b.html.(visited on October 6,2010). 被引量:1
  • 4David Shambaugh,"China' s Fragile Future",World Policy Journal,Vol.11,No.3,Fall,1994,pp.41-45. 被引量:1
  • 5王缉思.“遏制”还是“交往”?——评冷战后美国对华政策[J].国际问题研究,1996(1):1-6. 被引量:10
  • 6Barry R.Posen and Andrew L.Ross,"Competing Visions for U.S.Grand Strategy",International Security,Vol.21,No.3,Winter,1996-1997,p.48. 被引量:1
  • 7Tony Karon,"Bush China Policy Defaults to Engagement",Time,July 31,2001,http://www.time.com/time/columnist/karon/article/0,9565,169585,00.html (visited on October 6,2010). 被引量:1
  • 8The White House,The National Security Strategy of the United States of America,September 2002,http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/national/nss-020920.pdf (visited on October 6,2010). 被引量:1
  • 9The White House,The National Security Strategy of the United States of America,March 2006,http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2006/nss2006.pdf (visited on October 6,2010). 被引量:1
  • 10Barack Obama,"Renewing American Leadership",Foreign Affairs,July/August,2007,p.12. 被引量:1

二级参考文献22

共引文献1340

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部