期刊文献+

传统企业与高新技术企业IPO定价多因素模型研究 被引量:2

The Research on Tradtional and Hi-Tech Shanghai Stock Exchange Listed Companies'IPO Pricing Multifactor Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文以2002年到2010年3月在上交所A股市场发行上市的传统企业和高新技术企业为样本,比较研究了对两类企业IPO定价有显著影响的内外部因素。在此基础上建立两类企业IPO定价多因素模型。描述性统计结果表明,高新技术企业的研发能力、偿债能力、成长性优于传统企业;传统企业的周转能力优于高新技术企业。IPO定价多因素模型表明,对传统企业IPO价格有显著影响的因素是每股收益、发行股份和GDP增长率;对高新技术企业IPO价格有显著影响的因素是每股收益、GDP增长率、发行股份以及持有大专以上文凭人数占总劳动力比重。 Based on the sample of traditional and hi-tech listed companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2002 to 2010,research on the internal and external determinants of the two types of companies'IPO price is conducted and then established IPO pricing multifactor models respectively.The descriptive analysis indicates that averagely hi-tech companies are better than traditional in respect of RD,liquidity,leveraging and potential growth,but traditional companies are better than hi-tech regarding inventory and receivables turnover.The established IPO pricing multifactor models show that earnings per share,number of shares issued and GDP growth rate have significant impact on traditional companies'IPO price.In terms of Hi-Tech companies,besides the above three factors,the percentage of employees with junior college diploma or above also has significant impact on IPO price.
作者 刘佳
出处 《科学技术与工程》 2010年第33期8347-8351,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
关键词 传统企业 高新技术企业 首次公开募股(Initial PUBLIC offerings IPO)定价 多因素模型 traditional company hi-tech company IPO pricing multifactor model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献15

共引文献215

同被引文献29

  • 1刘志彪,徐天舒.培育“专精特新”中小企业:补链强链的专项行动[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2022(1):23-32. 被引量:48
  • 2BARRY C B,et al.The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies:Evidence from the going-public process[J].The Journal of Finance Economics,1990,27(2):447-471. 被引量:1
  • 3DAVID P B.A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues[J].Journal of Finance,1982,37(4):955-976. 被引量:1
  • 4IVO WELCH.Seasoned offerings imitation costs,and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J].Journal of Finance,1989,44(2):421-450. 被引量:1
  • 5LAWRENCE M,et al.How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues[J].Journal of Financial Economies,1989,24(2):343-361. 被引量:1
  • 6KEVIN R.Why New Issues are Underpriced?[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1986,15(1/2):187-212. 被引量:1
  • 7JOHN H,ALAN W.The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s[J].American Economic Review,1993(83):259-264. 被引量:1
  • 8HOLINSTROM B.Agency Costs and Innovation[J].Journal of Economic Behaviour and organization,1989(12):305-327. 被引量:1
  • 9GEORGE A A.The market for“Lemons”:Quality Uncertainty and the market mechanism[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970,84(3):488-500. 被引量:1
  • 10LOCKETT A,MURRAY G,WRIGHT M.Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms[J].Research Policy 2002,31(6):1009-1030. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部