摘要
过失犯是对客观注意义务和主观注意义务的违反。交通过失的客观注意义务源于成文的交通法规和交通惯例,应根据具体场合确定其内容,对实行行为应从存在论和规范论双方把握。交通过失的具体预见可能性是指"容易"预见到交通过失犯构成要件结果发生的可能性,应当以能力区别说确立预见可能的标准,同时应预见到因果的基本经过。交通过失中的信赖原则,根据场合的不同可属于客观注意义务或主观注意义务的限定要素。鉴于我国交通现状,应谨慎适用信赖原则与危险分配的法理。
The unintentional crime violates objective and subjective duty of care.The objective duty of care of traffic negligence is from written traffic laws and traffic practice,whose content should be determined by specific condition,and should hold from practice and norms of behavior.Foresee the specific possibility of traffic negligence means ＂easy＂ to foresee the possibility of results of traffic fault committed,which should be based on the standard of ability to distinguish the possibility of foresee,while it is expected that the basic process of results should be foresaw.The trust principle in traffic negligence can be limited element of objective or subjective duty of care according to the different situations.China＇s transportation should carefully apply the trust principles and risk allocation.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期15-23,共9页
Legal Forum
关键词
交通过失
客观注意义务
主观注意义务
信赖原则
traffic fault
objective duty of care
subjective duty of care
trust principle
