期刊文献+

学术生活断片 被引量:3

Fragments of My Academic Life
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1960年代不知不觉培养了朴素、节制的文体意识。进入新时期以后,在中国当代文学研究领域,逐步开始寻找在"文学"与"历史"之间建立的内在关联。文学的"外部"与"内部"不再是互相分离的因素,文学也不仅是作家作品,同时也是特定历史条件下的意义生产和传播的整个过程。当代文学史学科存在两个方面的问题,一是寻求更妥切、有效的学科概念与叙述方式,另一是对原有的概念和叙述方式的清理。前者着眼于寻找更合适概括以取代"当代文学"这一概念,后者则是留住这一概念以真切认知它的历史。我觉得自己有一定条件做后面这项工作,也就是"设法将问题‘放回’到‘历史情境’中去审察",试图呈现这些核心范畴和叙述方式的内在逻辑,揭示它们如何建构自身,产生怎样的文学形态。 In the 1960s, I cultivated a simple and restrained stylistic awareness. In the new era, I began to look for the inner connection between literature and history in the field of contemporary Chinese literature. The outside and inside of literature were no longer separated from each other; literature was not only the works of a certain writer, but also the whole process of meaning production and dissemination under particular historical conditions. Contemporary literature is faced with two problems: looking for more suitable and effective disciplinary concept and mode of narration, and sorting the concepts and modes of narration already in existence. The former aims to find something to replace the concept of contemporary literature, and the latter tries to keep this concept to trace its history. Personally, I feel qualified for the latter. I mainly attempt to disclose the inner logic of these core categories and mode of narration, how they form themselves and what literary forms they produce.
作者 洪子诚
机构地区 北京大学中文系
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2010年第5期39-46,96,共9页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
关键词 当代文学史 文学 历史 清理 学科概念 叙述方式 内在逻辑 history of contemporary literature literature history sorting disciplinary concept mode of narration inner logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

共引文献84

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部