期刊文献+

296例Ⅱ期胸段食管鳞癌术后患者的预后分析 被引量:2

An Analysis of Prognosis in 296 Cases with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stage Ⅱ Postoperation
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨影响Ⅱ期胸段食管鳞癌术后预后的因素。[方法]回顾性分析南通市肿瘤医院胸外科2002年1月至2005年1月收治的296例单纯手术切除食管鳞癌患者的临床资料。[结果]全组总的1、3、5年生存率分别为86.8%(257/296)、54.0%(160/296)、42.9%(127/296)。ⅡA期和ⅡB期患者的5年生存率分别为51.3%(99/193)和27.2%(28/103)(P<0.001)。患者的性别、淋巴结转移、手术切缘情况、肿瘤浸润深度及组织分化程度均为预后影响因素(P<0.05),而患者年龄、肿瘤部位及肿瘤长度与预后无关(P>0.05)。[结论]影响Ⅱ期胸段食管鳞癌患者术后生存的主要因素有性别、淋巴结转移及手术切缘情况、肿瘤浸润深度及组织分化程度。 [Purpose] To investigate the prognosis of the thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma stageⅡ postoperation. [Methods] The clinical data of 296 cases with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma stage Ⅱ from Jan. 2002 to Jan,2005 underwent surgery alone were analyzed retro-spectively. [Results] The overall 1-,3-,5-year survival was 86.8%,54.0%,42.9%,respectively. The 5-year survival rates in stage ⅡA and stage ⅡB were 51.3%(99/193) and 27.2%(28/103)(P〈0.001) ,respectively. Gender,lymph node metastasis,surgical margin status,depth of invasion and differentia-tion related to prognosis,but age,tumor site and tumor size did not related to prognosis. [Conclu-sions] Gender,lymph node metastasis,surgical margin status,depth of invasion and differentiation are prognostic factors in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma stage Ⅱ postoperation.
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2010年第9期732-734,共3页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 食管癌 Ⅱ期 外科手术 生存期 预后因素 esophageal carcinoma stage Ⅱ surgical operation survival prognostic factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Rohatgi PR, Correa AM, Swisher SG, et al. Gender-based analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation: differences in presentation and therapy outcome[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2006, 19(3):152-157. 被引量:1
  • 2Hidaki H, Hotokezaka M, Nakashima S, et al. Sex difference in survival of patients treated by surgical resection for esophageal cancer [J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(10): 1982-1987. 被引量:1
  • 3Elsaleh H, Cserni G, Iacopetta B. Extent of nodal involvement in stage Ⅲ colorectal carcinoma: relationship to clinicopathologic variables and genetic alterations[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(9):1218-1222. 被引量:1
  • 4Visbal AL, Williams BA, Nichols FC 3rd, et al. Gender differences in non-small-cell lung cancer survival: analysis of 4,618 patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 78(1):209-215. 被引量:1
  • 5Majetschak M, Christensen B, Obertacke U, et al. Sex differences in posttraumatic cytokine release of endotoxinstimulated whole blood: relationship to the development of severe sepsis[J]. J Trauma, 2000, 48(5):832-839. 被引量:1
  • 6Shimada H, Okazumi S, Matsubara H, et al. Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node dissection [J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(8):1441-1449. 被引量:1
  • 7Wijnhoven BP, Tran KT, Esterman A, et al. An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245 (5):717- 725. 被引量:1
  • 8程德志,蒋成榜,张虎祥,何志锋,池闯.食管癌组织和切缘P53蛋白表达及其与预后的关系[J].温州医学院学报,2009,39(3):267-268. 被引量:3
  • 9Khan OA, Alexiou C, Soomro I, et al. Pathological determinants of survival in node-negative oesophageal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2004, 91(12):1586-1591. 被引量:1
  • 10卢珠明,张华,王铭辉,崔东海,杨艳旗,黄洪铮.胸段食管鳞癌淋巴结转移强度和淋巴结清扫手术方式分析[J].癌症,2006,25(5):604-608. 被引量:38

二级参考文献18

共引文献52

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部