摘要
本位是一个"问题与主义之争"的问题,关系法之纲领、指导思想、基本观念,更关系到责任机制,对立法和司法影响甚大。何谓民法和商法的本位,学界结论似较清楚,但实际并不统一,仍有探讨余地。文章本于民、商分立立场,在对民、商本位予以定位与区分的基础上,否弃个人本位与社会本位两极选择之困境,提出无论近代民法还是现代民法仍贯行个人本位,而商法实行的是企业本位,并对此予以了申明和证立。在民、商本位区分的基础上,对民事责任和商事责任的形成机制和调整机制予以一定的比较研究。
Standard,a topic of dispute of issue and doctrine,relates to the program,the guiding ideology and basic concepts of law,and also the liability mechanism,and it has great influence on legislation and justice.It seems relatively clear concerning what is the standard of civil or commercial law,but actually it is not uniform,and there is still room for study.Based on the standpoint of separation of civil and commercial code,the thesis abandons the polarization selection dilemma between personal and social standard,then suggests and demonstrates that civil law persists in personal standard while commercial law upholds enterprise one.Formation and regulation mechanism of civil and commercial liability are also studied comparatively in the paper.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第3期61-69,共9页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
民法本位
商法本位
本位区分
责任机制
civil law standard
commercial law standard
distinction of standards
liability mechanism
