摘要
周作人的气节观念与气节问题都需要以求知的态度来检讨与面对。周作人的"失节"不可否认,但并不意味着其气节观念的价值可以被完全否认。在救亡热情高涨的年代,周作人的气节观念显示了自己独特的理论思考与问题指向。如果说,同时代的人是在以鼓吹气节的方式来抵抗日本对中国的侵略,周作人则是以批判气节的方式揭露日本对世界的危害。周作人的失节问题不在于他的气节思想,而在于他未能真正履行自己的气节思想。
The integrity concept and integrity issues of Zhou Zuoren need to be reviewed and faced in a knowledge attitude. Zhou Zuoren＇s ＂disloyalty＂ is undeniable, but it does not mean that the value of his integrity concept may be completely denied. In the era of enthusiasm salvation, Zhou Zuoren＇s integrity concept display its own unique theoretical thinking and problem points. If contemporary person resisted Japanese aggression against China in a way of promoting integrity, Zhou Zuoren has exposed Japanese harm to the world in the way of criticizing integrity. Zhou Zuoren＇s disloyalty is not his integrity ideas, but because he has not really fulfilled his integrity thought.
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期80-84,共5页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
作者所主持的国家社科基金项目(07CZW030)
上海交大文科创新基金项目(08TS3)的阶段性成果
关键词
气节
失节
知识
道德
救亡
启蒙
integrity
disloyalty
knowledge
moral
salvation
Enlightenment
