摘要
"国内产业"是构建服务贸易紧急保障措施机制的关键性概念。基于服务贸易的多样性和复杂性,要对"国内产业"进行界定相当棘手。服务贸易模式3下的商业存在可分为两个阶段——"前商业存在"和"后商业存在",后商业存在无论是否划归国内产业,都会产生难题。目前的谈判趋势是成员国内法中的国内产业定义与商业存在的既得权相结合。我国所采的"国内产业"的定义应既能有效地保护本国产业,又不打击外国投资的积极性。
＂Domestic industry＂ is a key concept of the emergency safeguard measures in GATS.The diversity and complexity of the trade in services have caused considerable difficulties to define ＂domestic industry＂.Commercial presence in the mode 3 of trade in services can be classified into pre-establishment phase and postestablishment phase.Whether the latter is included in the definition of domestic industry or not,this will lead to a dilemma.The recent trend of negotiations relating to the issue is that the member＇s own definition of domestic industry should be combined with the acquired rights under the commercial presence.China should accept a definition of domestic industry that can allow it to protect its own industries and will not result in a blow to foreign investment activity.
出处
《国际经贸探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第10期61-66,共6页
International Economics and Trade Research
关键词
服务贸易
紧急保障措施
国内产业
商业存在
trade in services
emergency safeguard measures
domestic industry
commercial presence
