期刊文献+

资产计量模式差异研究 被引量:3

On the Discrepancy of Assets' Measurement Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有形资产的计量模式与无形资产的计量模式在诸多方面存在差异。有形资产计量的关键是要测量有形资产的经济价值,无形资产计量的关键则是要测量无形资产在实现企业目标过程中所发挥的作用及其作用机理;有形资产通常采用单维财务计量模式,而无形资产则通常采用多维综合计量模式,两类资产计量模式的选择及其历史变迁与这两类资产的本质特征及其在企业的作用机理密切相关,同时也是为了实现目的性计量和事实性计量的有机统一。 There are many differences in the measurement models between tangibles and intangibles.The key of tangibles' measurement is to measure its economic value,while the key of intangibles' measurement is to measure its role and its mechanism of action in the process of fulfilling enterprise's objects.Single financial measurement is fit for tangibles' measurement,while multi-dimensional comprehensive measurement is appropriate for intangibles' measurement.The measurement models of two kinds of assets and their evolution are closely related to their different nature and their different mechanism of action in enterprises,and are the uniformity of purposeful measurement and factual measurement.
作者 董必荣 李虎
出处 《中南财经政法大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期110-115,共6页 Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"双组织承诺及其前因后果"(07CSH027) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目"我国大学智力资本报告研究"(09YJC880051) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"我国高科技行业上市公司智力资本信息披露问题研究"(08SJD6300030) 江苏省社会科学基金项目"江苏区域智力资本的测算与比较分析"(08EYD025)
关键词 有形资产 无形资产 财务计量 多维综合计量 Tangibles Assets Intangibles Assets Financial Measurement Multi-dimensional Comprehensive Measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1552
  • 2巴鲁·列弗.2003.无形资产--管理、计量和呈报.王志台,唐春霞和杨明译.北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3DATI. 2000. A Guideline for Intellectual capital statements - A Key to Knowledge Management. 被引量:1
  • 4Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. 2003. Intellectual Capital Statements--The New Guideline. 被引量:1
  • 5European Commission. 2006. Encourage Corporate Measuring and Reporting on Research and Other Forms of Intellectual Capital. 被引量:1
  • 6Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour. 2004. Intellectual capital statement - Made in Germany. 被引量:1
  • 7Jacobsen, Kristine and Peder Hofman - Bang. 2005. The IC - Rating Model by Intellectual Capital Sweden. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 : 570 - 587. 被引量:1
  • 8Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 2005. Guidelines for Disclosure of Intellectual Assets Based Management. 被引量:1
  • 9Karl -Erik Sveiby. 2005. The Intangible Assets Monitor. http: //www. sveiby. com. 被引量:1
  • 10Karl- Erik Sveiby. 2003. Measuring Models for Intangible Assets and Intellectual Capital -an overview of 34 methods with links, http: //www. sveiby. com. 被引量:1

共引文献34

同被引文献19

  • 1曾洁琼.企业智力资本计量问题研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(3):107-114. 被引量:11
  • 2孙铮,刘浩.中国会计改革新形势下的准则理论实证研究及其展望[J].会计研究,2006(9):15-22. 被引量:60
  • 3佟岩,王化成.关联交易、控制权收益与盈余质量[J].会计研究,2007(4):75-82. 被引量:117
  • 4Kamran Ahmed, Haim Falk. The Value Relevance of Management's Research and Development Reporting Choice: Evidence from Australia [J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2006 (25) : 231 -264. 被引量:1
  • 5Dennis R. Oswald &Paul Zarowin. Capitalization of R&D and the Informativeness of Stock Prices [ J]. European Accounting Review, 2007 (16) : 703 -726. 被引量:1
  • 6Eli Amir, Yanling Guan and Giland Livne. The Association of R&D and Capital Expenditures with Subsequent Earnings [J]. Journal of Busl- ness Finance&Accounting, 2007 (34): 222-246. 被引量:1
  • 7Dennis R. Oswald. The Determinants and Value Relevance of the Choice of Accounting for Research and Development Expenditures in the U- nited Kingdom [ J]. Journal of Business Finance&Accounting, 2008 (35) : 1 - 24. 被引量:1
  • 8Garen Markarian, Lorenzo Pozza & Annalisa Prencipe. Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies [J]. The International Journal of Accounting, 2008 (43) : 246 -267. 被引量:1
  • 9朱益民.白酒业黄金十年真相[N].21世纪经济报道,2012-07-20. 被引量:1
  • 10余恕莲,吴革.企业成本理论与方法研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010. 被引量:3

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部