摘要
采用Bardach术式对36例腭裂患者(Ⅱ度15例、Ⅲ度21例)作腭裂整复术,并对36例Ⅱ度20例、Ⅲ度16例腭裂患者作Landolt(兰)法修复腭裂,术后效果对比分析。Bardach术式:腭瘘2.77%(1/36),出血(0/36),喉梗阻(0/36);兰法:腭瘘16.6%(6/36),出血5.55%(2/36),喉梗阻2.77%(1/36);2种术式术后腭瘘对比,χ2=3.94,P<0.05,2种术式出血、喉梗阻对比,χ2=4.17,P<0.05。提示:Bardach术式优于兰法术式。
From January,2008 to August,2009,the same senior doctor operated on 36 cases of patients with palatoschisis by the two walves-Bardach＇s method（15 cases of II degree and 21 cases of III degree）and 36 cases of patients with palatoschisis by Landolt＇s method（20 cases of II degree and 16 cases of III degree）.Comparative analysis of the effect of the operations：Bardach＇s method：palatal fistula 2.77%（1/36）,bleeding（0/36）,obstruction of larynx（0,36）;Landolt＇s：palatal fistula 16.6%（6/36）,bleeding 5.55%（2/36）,obstruction of larynx 2.77%（1/36）.The comparison of the operations of palatal fistula with the two methods,χ2=3.94,P0.05.The comparison of the bleeding and obstruction of larynx,χ2=4.17,P0.05.The effect of Bardach＇method was better than Landolt＇s method.
出处
《实用口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第5期685-686,共2页
Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词
腭裂术式
腭瘘
出血
喉梗阻
疗效对比
并发症
Palatorrhaphy
Palatal fistula
Bleeding
Obstruction of larynx
Comparative efficacy
Complication
