摘要
:自1994年5月~1998年6月对64例急性心肌梗塞(AMI)患者行冠脉和静脉溶栓.并进行对比性研究.结果表明24例冠脉溶栓(PTCR)的血管再通率为83.3%.40例静脉溶栓的血管再通率为55.0%.二者疗效比较有显著差异。溶栓治疗后未出现严重并发症。
Sixty four patients with a acute myocardial infarction underwent either PTCR (24 patients) or intravenous thrombolytic therapy (40 patients) since May 1994 to July 1998 in my hospital. The recanalizing rate of infarct related artery in Patients with PTCR was 83. 3%, while in those with intravenous thrombolytic therapy was 55%. There was a significant difference in the clinical efficary of two methods, and there were no severe complications after thrombolytic therapy.
出处
《镇江医学院学报》
1999年第2期190-191,共2页
Journal of Zhenjiang Medical College
关键词
心肌梗塞
尿激酶
溶栓治疗
Myocardial infarction
Urokinase
Thrombolytic therapy