期刊文献+

舒芬太尼和芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于子宫切除术后硬膜外自控镇痛的临床观察 被引量:2

Comparison of Sufentanil and Fentanyl in Combination with Ropivacaine in Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia for Post-abdominal Total Hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于子宫切除术后硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)的效果并与等效剂量的芬太尼比较。方法择期经腹行子宫切除术患者120例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,采用随机双盲法分为2组:RF组和RS组,每组60例。术后硬膜外自控镇痛分别采用芬太尼6μg/mL、舒芬太尼0.6μg/mL复合0.2%罗哌卡因。观察和记录患者术后镇痛开始前,开始后2、4、8、16、24h视觉模拟法(VAS)评分、Bromage改良运动评分、总按压次数/实际有效进药次数(D1/D2)比值及术后恶心、呕吐等不良反应发生情况。结果镇痛开始后两组VAS评分较镇痛开始前均显著下降(P<0.01);与RF组比较,RS组镇痛开始后2h时的VAS评分显著降低(P<0.01),镇痛开始后24h内实际有效按压次数显著减少(P<0.01);两组患者镇痛开始后Bromage改良运动评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且未发生恶心、呕吐等不良反应。结论 0.6μg/mL舒芬太尼复合0.2%罗哌卡因用于经腹子宫切除术后PCEA能获得更满意的镇痛效果,且不良反应发生率低。 Objective To compare and investigate the efficiency of sufentanil or fentanyl in combination with ropivacaJne in patient-controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA) for post-abdominal total hysterectomy analgesia. Methods ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients (n=120) with elective abdominal total hysterectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: Group RF with 60 in it and Group RS with 60 in it , and Group RF received fentanyl 6μg/ml in combination with 0.2% ropivaeaine for PCEA postoperatively and Group RS received sufentanil 0.6μg/ml in combination with 0.2% ropivacaine for PCEA postoperatively. The VAS score, modified Bromage scales, the ratio between the total number of attempts (D1) and the number of successfully delivered doses (D2)(D1/ D2) were recorded before PCEA started and 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h after PCEA started. Side effects such as nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Results The VAS of two groups was significantly decreased after PCEA started compared with that before PCEA(P〈0.01), and the VAS of Group RS was significantly lower than that of Group RF at 2h after PCEA started (P〈0.01). The D2 was significantly decreased in 24h after PCEA started (P〈0.01). The modified Bromage scales and the incidence of side effects had no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion In PCEA 0.2% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.6μg/ml provides better analgesia after abdominal total hysterectomy, with fewer side effects.
作者 易洪章
出处 《中国现代医生》 2010年第29期36-37,39,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 舒芬太尼 芬太尼 罗哌卡因 镇痛 硬膜外 子宫切除 Sufentanil Fentanyl Ropivacaine Analgesia Epidural Abdominal total hysterectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Chestnut DH. Efficacy and safety of epidural opioids for postoperativeanalgesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 2005,102( 1 ):221-223. 被引量:1
  • 2Stahl KD,Van Bever W,Janssen P,et al. Receptor affinity and pharmacological potency of a series of narcotic analgesic,anti-diarrheal and neuroleptic drugs[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 1977,46 (3): 199-205. 被引量:1
  • 3庄心良等主编..现代麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:66.
  • 4Thomson IR,Harding G,Hudson RJ. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery by pass graft surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2000,14(7 ):552-656. 被引量:1
  • 5黄佳佳,汪正平.椎管内应用阿片类药物研究进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2009,30(6):544-547. 被引量:4
  • 6Menigaux C, Guignard B, Fletcher D, et al. More epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001,93 (2):472-476. 被引量:1
  • 7Meininger D,Byhahn C,Kessler P. Intrathecal fentanyl,sufentanil,or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery[J]. Anesth Analg,2003,96 (3): 852-858. 被引量:1
  • 8Joris JL,Jacob EA,Sessler DI,et al. Spinal mechanisms contribute to analgesia produced byepidural sufentanil combined with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia[J]. Anesth Analg,2003,97(5):1446-1451. 被引量:1
  • 9Schug SA, Scott DA, Payne J, et al. Postoperative analgesia by continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine after upper abdominal surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1996,76(9):487-491. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

  • 1Ummenhofer WC, Arends RH, Shen DD, et al. Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92(3): 739-753. 被引量:1
  • 2Bernards CM, Shen DD, Sterling ES, et al. Epidural, cerebraspinal fluid, and plasma pharmacokinetics of epidural opioids: Part 1. Differences among opioids. Anesthesiology, 2003, 99(2): 455 -465. 被引量:1
  • 3Berrnards CM. Recent insights into the pharmacokinetics of spinal opioids and the relevance to opioid selection. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2004, 17(5): 441-447. 被引量:1
  • 4Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos AC. Post-cesaren delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101(5 suppl): S62-S69. 被引量:1
  • 5Meniganx C, Guignard B, Fletcher D, et al. More epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief. Anesth Analg, 2001, 93(2): 472-476. 被引量:1
  • 6Mather LE, Cousins MJ. The site of action of epidural fentanyl: what can be learned by studying the difference between infusion and bolus administration? The importance of history, one hopes. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97(5): 1211-1213. 被引量:1
  • 7Cohen S, Pantuck CB, Amar D, et al. The primary action of epidural fentanyl after cesarean delivery is via a spinal mechanism. Anesth Analg, 2002, 94(3): 674-679. 被引量:1
  • 8Guinard JP, Carpenter RL, Chassot PG. Epidural and intravenous fentanyl produce equivalent effects during major surgery. Anesthesiology, 1995, 82(2): 377-382. 被引量:1
  • 9Ginosar Y, Riley ET, Angst MS. The site of action of epidural fentanyl in humans: the difference between infusion and bolus administration. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97(5): 1428-1438. 被引量:1
  • 10Chestnut DH. Efficacy and safety of epidural opioids for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology, 2005, 102( 1 ) : 221-223. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部