期刊文献+

阅读理解测试中常用题型的对比研究

A Comparative Study on Item Types of English Reading Comprehension Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用定量研究的方法,探讨阅读测试中多项选择、简答和正误判断三种题型与阅读理解能力之间的关系。研究设计中的受试者为390名武警学院的战士学员。统计程序使用SPSS对数据进行相关分析和回归分析。研究结果表明:多项选择、简答和正误判断三种题型都适合测试考生的阅读理解能力,但简答题是最有效的测试题型。 This quantitative study examines the relationship between MCQ,SAQ and T/F and reading comprehension abilities.The research design adopted in this study involved soldier student participants from Armed Police Forces Academy.The data were analyzed using inferential statistics(e.g.,Correlation and Regression).The present study yields the following findings: the three item types are all appropriate to measure test-takers' reading abilities.Compared with MCQ and T/F,SAQ is the most effective item type to test abilities of reading.
作者 王华
机构地区 武警学院基础部
出处 《武警学院学报》 2010年第9期81-83,共3页 Journal of the Armed Police Academy
关键词 阅读理解测试 阅读能力 多项选择 简答 正误判断 reading comprehension test reading ability MCQ SAQ T/F
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1ALDERSON J C.Assessing Reading[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000. 被引量:1
  • 2ALDERSON J C,C CLAPHAM & D WALL.Language Test Construction and Evaluation[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1995. 被引量:1
  • 3BACHMAN L F.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990. 被引量:1
  • 4HEATON J B.Writing English Language Tests[M].Shanghai:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2000. 被引量:1
  • 5HUGHES A.Testing for English Teachers[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989. 被引量:1
  • 6KOBAYASHI M.Method Effects on Reading Comprehension Test Performance:Text Organization and Response Format[J].Language Testing,2002,(19):193-220. 被引量:1
  • 7LEE J F.Comprehending the Spanish Subjunctive:An Information Processing Perspective[J].Modern Language Journal,1987,(71):50-57. 被引量:1
  • 8SHOHAMY E.Does the Testing Method Make a Difference?The Case of Reading Comprehension[J].Language Testing,1984,(1):147-70. 被引量:1
  • 9WEIR C J.Language Testing and Validation:An Evidence-based Approach[M].In CANDLIN C N and Hall D R (eds).Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics.Basingstoke,HampShire:Palgrave Macmillan,2005. 被引量:1
  • 10桂诗春编..标准化考试 理论·原则与方法[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1986:196.

二级参考文献13

  • 1刘建达.测试方法对阅读测试的影响[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(2):50-54. 被引量:40
  • 2Bachman,L.F.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. . 1990 被引量:1
  • 3Bachman,L.F,& A.S.Pal mer.Language Testing Practice. . 1996 被引量:1
  • 4Hughes,A.Testing for Language Teachers. . 2000 被引量:1
  • 5Krashen,S. D.Second Language Acquisition and Language Learning. . 1981 被引量:1
  • 6Lee,J .F.Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive : An information processing perspective. ModernLanguage Journa . 1987 被引量:1
  • 7Popham,W.J.Modern Educational Measurement. . 1990 被引量:1
  • 8Samson,D. M. M.Rasch and Reading. Practice and Problem in LanguageTesting . 1983 被引量:1
  • 9Shohamy,E.Does the testing method make a difference ? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing . 1984 被引量:1
  • 10Widdowson,H. G.Explorations in Applied Linguistics. . 1979 被引量:1

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部