摘要
我国古典词源"诗余"论的承传,大致有三条:一是从总体上阐说词源于诗体的承传,二是分论词源于风骚之体的承传,三是分论词源于唐人近体诗的承传。上述传承,从不同视点上展开了词导源于诗体之论,共同构出古典词源"诗余"论的主体论说空间。
The connecting link of the discussing on ＂Shiyu＂ of Chinese Classical Ci-poetry express in three clues ： the first is the connecting link of the explaining as a whole that Ci-poetry headstream, mainly comes from poetry, the second is the connecting link of the discussing that Ci-poetry comes from ＂ Feng＂ and ＂Sao＂, the third is the con- necting link of the discussing that Ci-poetry comes from the Tang Dynasty ＂modem style＂ poetry. The above-men- tioned clues, expand the discussing on Ci-poetry comes from poetry from different views, compose main discussing space of ＂Shiyu＂ criticism of Chinese Classical Ci-poetry headstream.
出处
《青海民族大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2010年第4期135-139,共5页
Journal of Qinghai Minzu University：Social Sciences
基金
2007年度国家社会科学基金项目"中国古代文论承传研究"(项目编号:07cwz001)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
“诗余”论
承传
诗体
风骚
近体诗
＂Shiyu＂ criticism
connecting link clues
explaining as a whole
comes from ＂Feng＂ and ＂Sao＂
comes from the Tang Dynasty ＂modem style＂ poetry
