摘要
章学诚与其说是一位史学家、文论家,不如说是一位思想家。乾嘉学者为考据而考据,章学诚却在思考学术的意义何在。他提出"六经皆史也"与传统经学之"经学即理学"相抗衡。他认为"六经皆器",只不过是"先王之政典",因此经学训诂不足以明道,而通过文史却可以见道。由"文史见道",章学诚将文、史、哲都结合到了一起,指向了最基本的社会生活,使文与史都有了哲学意义,也使哲学不流于空泛。因此,他站在"道"的高度论文议史,直指文心史意,见前人及时人所未见之处。
Zhang Xuecheng was rather a thinker than a historian and a literary critic,for he was concerned with probing into the significance of systematic learning while other scholars of his day tended to conduct textural criticism for its own sake.Above all,he opined that ＂six classics are history＂ in opposition to the traditional concept that ＂the study of Confucian classics falls within the rationalistic Confucian philosophical school＂,for in his opinion,＂scriptures are all tools＂,and merely ＂the political classics of former sovereigns＂,therefore exegesis on the study of Confucian classics could not clarify the doctrine whereas literary and historical studies could.As such,Zhang Xuecheng managed to integrate literature,history and philosophy and touched upon the most basic social life,thus endowing literature and philosophy with philosophical meaning and replenishing philosophy,hence new attainments in his studies on history.
出处
《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第4期90-96,共7页
Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
西华大学校青年基金项目"章学诚历史文学思想"
项目编号QW0620719
关键词
章学诚
《文史通义》
文史见道
六经皆史
Zhang Xuecheng
A General Introduction to Literature and History
Wen Shi Tong Yi（the illustrative functions of literature and history）
＂Six Classics＂ are history
