期刊文献+

数据处理方法不确定性对CO_2通量组分估算的影响 被引量:13

Impacts of uncertainty in data processing on estimation of CO_2 flux components.
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于中国陆地生态系统通量观测研究网络(ChinaFLUX)4个站点(2个森林站和2个草地站)的涡度相关通量观测资料,分析了CO2通量数据处理过程中异常值剔除参数设置、夜间摩擦风速(u*)临界值(u*c)确定及数据插补模型选择对CO2通量组分估算的影响.结果表明:3种数据处理方法均对净生态系统碳交换量(NEE)年总量估算有显著影响,其中u*c确定是影响NEE估算的重要因子;异常值剔除、u*c确定及数据插补模型选择导致NEE年总量估算偏差分别为0.62~21.31 g C.m-2.a-1(0.84%~65.31%)、4.06~30.28 g C.m-2.a-1(3.76%~21.58%)和0.69~27.73 g C.m-2.a-1(0.23%~55.62%),草地生态系统NEE估算对数据处理方法参数设置更敏感;数据处理方法不确定性引起的总生态系统碳交换量和生态系统呼吸年总量估算相对偏差分别为3.88%~11.41%和6.45%~24.91%. Based on the eddy covariance observations at 4 sites(2 forested sites and 2 grassland sites) in Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystem Flux Research Network(ChinaFLUX),this paper analyzed the effects of three data processing methods,i.e.,spike detection,threshold(u*c) determination of nocturnal friction velocity(u*),and gap-filling model selection,on the estimation of CO2 flux components.All the three methods had significant impacts on the estimation of annual net ecosystem exchange(NEE),and the determination of(u*c) was an important factor affecting the annual NEE estimation.The estimation deviation of the annual NEE caused by spike detection,determination of(u*c),and gap-filling model selection was 0.62-21.31 g C·m-2·a-1(0.84%-65.31%),4.06-30.28 g C·m-2·a-1(3.76%-21.58%),and 0.69-27.73 g C·m-2·a-1(0.23%-55.62%),respectively.Comparing with that of forested ecosystem,the NEE estimation of grassland ecosystem was more sensitive to the parameter setting of data processing method,and the relative estimation deviation of annual gross ecosystem exchange and ecosystem respiration induced by the uncertainty in data processing was 3.88%-11.41% and 6.45%-24.91%,respectively.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期2389-2396,共8页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41071251) 中国科学院重要方向性项目(KZCX2-YW-433-06) 中国科学院信息化专项(099R0410S4) 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2010CB833500) 国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作交流项目(30721140307)资助
关键词 涡度相关技术 CO2通量 数据处理 方差分析 不确定性 eddy covariance technique CO2 flux data processing variance analysis uncertainty.
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献96

共引文献261

同被引文献352

引证文献13

二级引证文献220

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部