期刊文献+

欧洲社会保障制度的改革动态与发展趋势 被引量:7

The Current Trend of Social Policy Reform in European Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代中期以后,支撑着欧洲传统福利国家的资本主义经济、社会、政治结构发生了很大变化,工作福利与社会投资论等劳动型社会保障政策和保障基本收入等非劳动型社会保障政策开始实行,传统福利国家走向衰退。工作福利与社会投资论强调加强劳动与福利之间的联系,而基本收入论则相反,它们围绕劳动与生产的理念差距形成了对策上的对立结构。虽然这些制度在联系劳动与福利的关系上是对立的,但在通过福利国家达成社会统合目标的过程中,有可能会相互融合,以达到新福利国家政策的愿景。 Since the mid-1970s,there has been a fundamental change in economic,social,and political structure,which maintains the traditional welfare capitalism in European countries.Along with social policy reform introducing labor-centered social policy such as workfare,social investment and non-labor-centered social policy such as basic income,the traditional welfare state has been dismantled.Workfare,social investment emphasizes the strong relationship between labor and welfare,whilst basic income conversely bears little relationship between the two.The contrasting difference of these programs in the idea surrounding the relationship between labor and welfare has brought about confrontational structure in its policy formation.Although these programs are confronted with relationship between labor and welfare,they might be mutually integrated in the process of achieving the goal of social integration and accomplishing the ideal picture of the welfare state.
作者 金炳彻
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期31-37,共7页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 欧洲社会保障变革 工作福利 社会投资 基本收入保障 social policy reform in European countries workfare social investment basic income
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Pierson, Paul. "Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare State". in Pierson, Paul(ed. ). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 2Taylor-Gooby, Peter. "New Risks and Social Change". in Peter Taylor-Gooby(ed. ). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Goodin, R. E. "Something for Nothing". in P. Van Parijs. et. Al.. What's Wrong v.rith a Free Lunch?. Boston,Mass. : Beacon Press, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 4Quaid, M. Work fare: Why Good Social Policy Ideas Go Bad. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 5Giddens, Anthony. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Malden,Mass. : Polity Press, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 6Giddens, Anthony. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge,Uk: Polity Press; Malden, Mass...Blackwell Publishers, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 7Perkins, Daniel, Lucy Nelms and Paul Smyth. Beyond Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment State?. Social Policy Working Paper No. 3. Brotherhood of St Laurence and Center for Public Policy (University of Melboune), 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Diamond, Patrick and Anthony Giddens. "The New Egalitarianism". in Patrick Diamnond and Anthony Giddens (eds.). The New Egalitarianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 9Van Parijs, Philippe. "Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the 21 Century". in Basic Income European Network VIIth International Congress Berlin, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 10Offe, Claus. "A Non-Productivist Design for Social Policies". in Van Parijs Philippe (ed.). Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London: Verso, 1992. 被引量:1

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部