期刊文献+

经内镜及外科手术治疗肝外胆管结石的疗效比较 被引量:51

Comparative efficacy after endoscopic versus surgical intervention for extrahepatic billiary stone
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经内镜治疗肝外胆管结石的价值。方法将200例肝外胆管结石患者分为内镜治疗组(内镜组)及外科手术组(手术组)各100例,内镜组首先完成经内镜胆胰管造影,诊断确立后即时行十二指肠乳头切开术及胆管取石术;手术组确诊后根据病情选择不同术式,行开腹手术。结果内镜组治愈率为98%,手术组为90%(P<0.01);黄疸消退时间内镜组为(3.05±0.12)天,手术组为(7.83±0.32)天(P<0.01);残余结石发生率内镜组为2%,手术组为10%(P<0.01);住院时间内镜组为(4.62±0.17)天,手术组为(23.59±2.76)天(P<0.01)。结论经内镜治疗肝外胆管结石的疗效明显优于手术疗效,是一种安全可靠的治疗方法。 Objective The consequences of interventional endoscopy for extrahepatic biliary stones were summed up and compared with that after traditional surgery. Methods Each 100 cases with extrahepatic biliary stone constituted the group undergoing endoscopic or operative therapy.Once diagnosis had been established by ERCP,endoscopic sphinterotomy(EST) was immediately followed to extract stones.Mode of operation preformed after celiotomy varied with indication. Results Rate of stone extraction reached 98% by EST and 90% by open surgery(P<0.01);days for initial jaundice ebbing and hospitalization were respectively 3.050.12,4.620.17 and 7.830.32,23.592.76;incidence of residual stone occurred in 2% of cases for the former and 10% for the latter(P<0.01). Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of EST seemed better than open surgery.
机构地区 天津南开医院
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 1999年第3期154-156,共3页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 肝外 胆管结石 外科手术 内窥镜 Extrahepatic biliary stonesEndoscopicinterventionSurgical operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献1

  • 1张能维,中华外科杂志,1989年,27卷,778页 被引量:1

共引文献20

同被引文献241

引证文献51

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部