期刊文献+

BACTEC树脂需氧瓶与树脂厌氧瓶临床应用评价

Controlled Clinical Evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F Medium for Culture Blood
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价BACTEC树脂需氧瓶和树脂厌氧瓶对血液中病原菌的检测能力。方法回顾性分析1241例BACTEC树脂需氧瓶、树脂厌氧瓶配对血液培养结果,比较分离病菌的种类及不同培养瓶报阳时间。结果 1 241份血液标本有138份报阳,分离病原菌141株(3份标本为复数菌感染)。需氧瓶和厌氧瓶分离病原菌126株和122株,107株病原菌可同时在两种血培养瓶生长,另有19株和15株分别只能在需氧瓶或厌氧瓶中生长。50%的肠杆菌和60%的阳性球菌的在厌氧瓶中生长迅速而先于需氧瓶报阳。结论厌氧树脂瓶检测菌血症有一定优势,联合使用需氧、厌氧瓶进行血培养能更有效、更快速诊断菌血症。 Objective To evaluate the performance of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F medium for recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from adult patients. Methods All blood cultures were performed by the BACTEC 9120 System with paired Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F Blood Culture bottles according to the protocol. The overall recovery of organisms and time to detect were analyzed retrospectively. Results 141 clinically important isolates were recovered from 138(250 bottles)patients with positive blood culture,of these isolates, 126 of 141 isolates were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F and 122 of 141 isolates were recovered from Plus Anaerobic/F bottles. On the other band, 107 were recovered from both pairs of bottles, with 19 recovered from only Plus Aerobie/F bottles and 15 recovered from only Plus Anaerobic/F. Conclusion Plus Anaerobie/F bottles enhanced recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from patients . the combination of Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F bottles showed better recovery than either of Plus Aerobie/F or plus Anaerobic/F bottles.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2010年第8期790-791,共2页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 树脂类 细菌 厌氧 细菌 需氧 菌血症 微生物敏感性试验 resins bacteria,anaerobic bacteria,aerobic bacteremia microbial sensitivity tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Lynn LH, Duane RH, Clinton KM, et al. Detection of Simulated Candidemia by the BACTEC 9240 System with Plus Aerobic/F and Anaerobic/F Blood Culture Bottles [J]. J Clin Mierobiol,2003,10(41) :4714-4717. 被引量:1
  • 2漆坚.全自动细菌鉴定仪对血培养阳性标本直接鉴定及药敏试验比较[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(5):397-398. 被引量:10
  • 3Mirrett S,Petti CA,Woods CW, et al. Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard an aerobic SN blood culture medium[J].J Clin Microbiol, 2004,10 (42): 4581-4585. 被引量:1
  • 4Brian CP, Stanley M, Betty RC, et al. Controlled clinical comparison of Bact/ALERT standard aerobic and stand ard anaerobic blood culture bottles inoculated directly or after transport in sodium polyanethol sulfonate tubes[J].J Clin Microbiol,2007,4(28) : 1357-1359. 被引量:1
  • 5Diane F, Anita PB, Teresa W, et al. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics [J]. J Clin Micobiol,2007,5(45) :816-821. 被引量:1
  • 6Ziegler R,Johnscher I, Martus P, et al. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections [J].J Clin Micobiol, 1998,36(3) :657-661. 被引量:1

二级参考文献2

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部