摘要
目的：肝素、病毒唑雾化治疗喘憋性肺炎疗效观察。方法：将１９７年收治入院的８２例患喘憋性肺炎的儿童分为两组。治疗组（４２例）用肝素、病毒唑超声雾化治疗；对照组（４０例）采用常规地塞米松、庆大霉素、α糜蛋白酶雾化吸入治疗。两组患儿均经抗感染及辅助体位拍背排痰治疗。结果显示：在控制喘憋症状，促进肺部体征消散及病原转阴方面，实验组显效２５例，有效１６例，无效１例；对照组显效４例，有效３２例，无效４例。可见两组有显著差异（Ｐ＜０００１）。结论：用肝素、病毒唑超声雾化治疗喘憋性肺炎临床疗效明显优于常规治疗。
Objective: The therapeutic effective obserration of asthmatic pneumonia was treated by heparin and virazole aerosol inhalation. Mtthods:82 in-patients with asthmatic pneumonia in 1997 were divided into two groups. Experiment group (42 cases) were treated with heparin, virazole ultiasonic aerosol inhalation and the control group(40 cases) with dexamethasone, gentamicin, α-chymotrypsin aerosol inhalation. Two groups were simultaneously treated with anti-infection accessary posture productive cough therapy. The result showed: in controlling asthmoid symptoms improving lung sign and turned pathogeny negative, experiment group had marked effect 25 cases, improved 16 cases and one ineffective, but control group 4 were marked effective, 32 improved and 4 ineffective. There was a very significant difference between two groups( P <0 001). Conclusion: Asthmatic pneumonia treated with heparin and virazole ultrasonie aerosol inhalation has better clinical effect than that of the routine therapy.
出处
《护士进修杂志》
北大核心
1999年第5期10-11,共2页
Journal of Nurses Training
关键词
肝素
病毒唑
超声雾化吸入
喘憋性肺炎
治疗
Heparin virazole ultrasonie aercsol inhalation Asthmatic pneumonia
