期刊文献+

家庭背景影响了人们教育和社会阶层地位的获得 被引量:35

Family Background Affecting People's Access to Education and Social Stratum Status
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对2008年全国性社会调查数据的分析后发现:以父母亲为表征的家庭背景不仅严重影响了人们的教育获得,而且还影响了人们初次就业职业的阶层地位和现就业职业的阶层地位。这预示着父母亲的受教育水平和阶层地位越高,子女的受教育水平和阶层地位也会越高;父母亲的受教育水平和阶层地位越低,子女的受教育水平和阶层地位也会越低。由此可见,1999年之后高等教育的扩招,给社会上层带来的收益远远大于社会下层的收益,使中国社会增加了封闭性特征而非开放性特征。这会影响中国社会的公平性,应该引起政策制定者的强烈关注。 Through analyzing the nationwide social investigation data conducted in 2008,the writer found:family background comes from parents not only affects respondents' access to education,but also strongly affects their social status' promotion.It indicates that the higher educational level and social stratum status the parents have,the higher educational level and social stratum status their children will have;the lower educational level and social stratum status the parents have,the lower educational level and social stratum status their children will have.Thus,the benefits brought by the expansion of higher education after 1999 for the upper social strata are far greater than the lower social strata,which increases china's closeness rather than open characteristics.This will affect the fairness of Chinese society and should arouse strong concern of policy makers.
作者 张翼
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期82-92,共11页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 家庭背景 教育差异 社会经济地位 family background educational difference social economic status
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1刘欣.阶级地位与市场机遇:韦伯的阶级理论——兼与马克思的阶级理论比较[J].社会科学研究,1993(5):70-75. 被引量:3
  • 2刘欣.转型期中国大陆城市居民的阶层意识[J].社会学研究,2001(3):8-17. 被引量:152
  • 3Buchmanm C. & Hannum E. (2001). Education and Stratification in Developing Countries: A Review of Theories and Research, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 27. 77-102. 被引量:1
  • 4Blau PM & Duncan OD. (1967). The American Occupational Structure, New York: Wiley. 被引量:1
  • 5Y. Shavit & Kraus V. (1990). Educational Transitions in Israel: A Test of the Industrialization and Credentialism Hypotheses. Sociology of Education, Vol. 63. No(2):2121-2145. 被引量:1
  • 6Hout M, Raftery AE. & Bell EO. (1993). Making the Grade: Educational Stratification in the United States, 1925--1965. In Blossfeld HP. & Y. Shavit (ed.). Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Westview Press:25-50. 被引量:1
  • 7Kerckhoff AC. (2001). Education and Social Stratification Processes in Comparative Perspective. Sociology of Education, Vol. 74, Extra Issue: Current of Thought: Sociology of Education at the Dawn of the 21st Century :3-18. 被引量:1
  • 8Slavin RE. (1987). Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 57, No. (3) : 293-336. 被引量:1
  • 9Gamoran A. & Mare RD. (1989). Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality? The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, No. (5) :1146-1183. 被引量:1
  • 10Alexander, KL. & Eckland, BK. (1977). High School Context and College Selectivity: Institutional Constraints in Educational Stratification. Social Forces, Vol. 56(1):166-188. 被引量:1

共引文献190

同被引文献580

引证文献35

二级引证文献466

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部