摘要
对民法中的肖像权条款,立法界和学术界似乎存在着一种误区,将其当作严格的规则看待,其实该条款只能是一项原则。上世纪末围绕《秋菊打官司》一案的学术争论足以证明这一点。肖像权案件的裁判需要将肖像权和其他权利进行衡量,以决出是非高下,这些权利被称为肖像权的"阻却要件"。按照日本案例法,主要有六个因素可以成为肖像权的"阻却要件":如犯罪调查和预防、新闻自由、科研和艺术自由、公众人物、风景拍照和公共集会等。这六个方面既值得我国在人格权立法中采纳,也值得法院今后在审理肖像权案件中予以考量。
It is misleading for the legislature and academic circles to observe the items in the Right of Image as strict rules, which, virtually should serve as a principle. Heated Arguments in the academic cirles around Qiu Ju＇s case in the film of The Story of,Qiu Ju may well demonstrate the above point. Cases concerning the infringement of the right of image must be judged by evaluating the importance of the right of image with other legal rights, namely , ＂immunity conditions＂. According to Japanese Case Law, six factors can compete with the right of image ： investigation and prevention of crimes, freedom of the press, freedom of research and art, public figures, landscape photographing, public assembly,etc. Such ＂immunity conditions＂ can not only be of use to China＇s legislations of personality rights, but deserve to be considered by court in cases involvinging the rights of image.
出处
《金陵科技学院学报（社会科学版）》
2010年第2期49-53,共5页
Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
秋菊案
肖像权
原则
阻却要件
Qiu Ju＇s case
right of image
principle
immunity conditions
