期刊文献+

发达国家和发展中国家生态补偿机制比较分析 被引量:13

Comparative analysis on the ecological compensation mechanisms in developed and developing countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 生态补偿是处理环境保护和经济发展之间的矛盾、保障环境保护领域的社会公平的重要手段。通过比较研究发现,发达国家的生态补偿机制基于完善公共财政体系,直接以降低保护区的经济活动强度为导向;发展中国家的生态补偿机制则更倾向于通过自然资源的可持续开发来补偿保护地的发展机会损失。这两类生态补偿机制在实际应用中都存在一定的局限性。研究认为,我国应当在借鉴发达国家和发展中国家经验的基础上,以降低保护地经济活动强度为导向,结合我国的城市化进程,建立适合我国国情的生态补偿机制。 Ecological compensation mechanism is an important way for dealing with the conflict between environmental protection and economic development,and ensuring the social justice in the environmental sector. According to comparative analysis,it points out that ecological compensation mechanisms in developed countries are based on efficient public finance systems and directly oriented to reduce the economic intensity in protected areas,while those in developing countries mostly tend to compensate the economic loss of protected areas through sustainable use of natural resources. Both mechanisms have their own limits in application. It's argued that China's ecological compensation mechanism should be combined with the rapid urbanization process,and directly oriented to reduce the economic intensity of protected areas.
作者 刘平养
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期1-5,共5页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"节能减排与环境保护宏观政策研究"(项目批准号:07JZD0008)的部分研究成果资助
关键词 生态补偿 经济活动强度 农业环境政策 ICDP ecological compensation economic intensity agri-environmental policy ICDP
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Claassen R, Hansen L, Peters M, et al. Agri -Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape[ M ]. US Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service : 2001. 被引量:1
  • 2Bernstein J, et al. " Agriculture and the Environment In the United States and EU [ M ]. " US EU Food and Agriculture Comparisons, 2004, WRS -04 -04. 被引量:1
  • 3Hughes R, Flintan F. Integrating Conservation and Development Experience: A Review and Bibliography of the lcdp Literature [ M ]. London: International Institute for Environment and Development : 2001. 被引量:1
  • 4Abbot J I O, Thomas D H L, Gardner A A, et al. Understanding the Links between Conservation and Development in the Bamenda Highlands, Cameroon [J]. World Development, 2001, 29 ( 7 ) : 1115 - 1136. 被引量:1
  • 5Crook C, Clapp R. "Is market -oriented forest conservation a contradiction in temps?" Environmental Conservation,2002,25 (2) : 131 - 145. 被引量:1
  • 6Rondeau D, Bulte E. Wildlife Damage and Agriculture : A Dynamic Analysis of Compensation Schemes [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007,89 ( 2 ) :490 - 507. 被引量:1
  • 7Johannesen A B, Skonhofi A. Tourism, Poaching and Wildlife Conservation: What Can Integrated Conservation and Development Projects Accomplish?[J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2005,27 (3) :208 - 226. 被引量:1
  • 8Ferraro P, Simpson R. A Review of What Works to Preserve Biodiversity[ J]. The RFF Reader in Environmental and Resource Policy (2nd edition), Oates, editor, RFF Press, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 9葛颜祥,吴菲菲,王蓓蓓,梁丽娟.流域生态补偿:政府补偿与市场补偿比较与选择[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(4):48-53. 被引量:57
  • 10秦艳红,康慕谊.国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(4):557-567. 被引量:209

二级参考文献47

共引文献279

同被引文献149

引证文献13

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部