摘要
就原告请求支付金钱债权是否可以分割诉讼请求,日本民事诉讼理论中素有否定观点与肯定主张之对立。日本的法院对此也是各持己见。虽然视角不同,但最终决定是否允许当事人分割诉讼请求并就残额请求另行诉讼的标准取决于诉讼标的和既判力。我国对于能否分割诉讼请求并无太多关注,但对于前诉口头辩论终结后发生的后遗症,民事法将之作为新案处理。对于部分请求所涉问题,应当在一次性解决纠纷的理念之下,否定当事人分割诉讼请求的权利将有助于提高诉讼效率并防止当事人滥用诉权以维持当事人之间的攻防平衡。
There has always been a dichotomy of attitudes under japanese civil procedural law as to if the plaintiff can break up a single pecuniary claim to sue seperately. The courts themselves also vary on this matter. No matter what perspective taken, the decisive criterion lies with the theory of claim and res judicata. The Chinese scholarly circle did＇ t pay much attention to this subject, but concerning the subsequent damages after oral argument during the prior action, the civil law considers it as a new case. As regards issues related to this matter, a once-and-for-all dispute resolution doctrine should be taken, and disallowing parties to break up a single claim is beneficial to efficiency of litigation, preventing abuse of process so as to achieve the balance between parties.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期118-126,共9页
Global Law Review
